Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dental battery"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Narutolovehinata5 (comment) |
imported>Evrik |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[[File:Edmontosaurus regalis tooth crowns.png|right|133px]] | [[File:Edmontosaurus regalis tooth crowns.png|right|133px]] | ||
+ | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I came here to review this, but it appears that the article is currently proposed to be merged to another article, so I would suggest putting this nomination on hold until that is resolved. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 23:10, 17 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] When it was nominated, it was new enough and long enough. I prefer the first hook. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 19:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 19:58, 23 December 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
Dental battery

Dental battery of the edmontosaurus
- ... that a dinosaurs dental battery can be compared to medieval scale armour or to denticles in a shark's skin? Source: "Each tooth is analogous to a single scale on medieval armor, or a single denticle in shark skin" [1]
- ALT1:... that dinosaurs with a dental battery could have up to 300 teeth? Source: "Hadrosaurid dinosaurs, dominant Late Cretaceous herbivores, possessed complex dental batteries with up to 300 teeth in each jaw ramus" [2]
- ALT2:... that the dental battery was a feature of dominant plant eating dinosaurs? Source: "The scientists believe the complexity of the dinosaur’s dentition contributed greatly to its success -- the hadrosaurids are believed to have been the dominant herbivore of their era"[3] ~ R.T.G 21:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- QPQ:Real Monasterio de Santo Tomás
- Comment:
QPQ soon,Possibly a difficult review, i.e. long read with scientific terms, but interesting ~ R.T.G 08:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC) Comment: The other image on the article may be more suitable, I'm going to post it below for opinions. ~ R.T.G 02:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Created by RTG (talk). Self-nominated at 08:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC).
I came here to review this, but it appears that the article is currently proposed to be merged to another article, so I would suggest putting this nomination on hold until that is resolved. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:10, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
When it was nominated, it was new enough and long enough. I prefer the first hook. --evrik (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)