Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dominic Tweddle"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Moonraker
(Reviewed)
imported>Moonraker
(Tweak)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The text of the article, which I believe is what counts, is five times expanded. Well-cited throughout, neutrally written, no signs of copyvio. Hook is cited to two online sources — one written by the subject of the article, but a reliable source not self-published, so I see no objection. I do have a quibble with the link to [[Late Roman ridge helmet]], which is surely off-topic? That would perhaps be better left out when this comes to be promoted. QPQ done, image is licensed. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 08:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)  
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The text of the article, which I believe is what counts, is five times expanded. Well-cited throughout, neutrally written, no signs of copyvio. Hook is cited to two online sources — one written by the subject of the article, but a reliable source not self-published, so I see no objection. I do have a quibble with the link to [[Late Roman ridge helmet]], which is surely off-topic? That link would perhaps be better left out when this comes to be promoted, or we might say "post-[[Late Roman ridge helmet|Roman]] helmet types"? QPQ done, image is licensed. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 10:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)  
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:44, 11 March 2018

Dominic Tweddle

The Anglo-Saxon Coppergate helmet
The Anglo-Saxon Coppergate helmet

5x expanded by Usernameunique (talk). Self-nominated at 21:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg The text of the article, which I believe is what counts, is five times expanded. Well-cited throughout, neutrally written, no signs of copyvio. Hook is cited to two online sources — one written by the subject of the article, but a reliable source not self-published, so I see no objection. I do have a quibble with the link to Late Roman ridge helmet, which is surely off-topic? That link would perhaps be better left out when this comes to be promoted, or we might say "post-Roman helmet types"? QPQ done, image is licensed. Moonraker (talk) 10:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)