Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Elephantomyia irinae"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gatoclass (→Elephantomyia irinae: reply kevmin) |
imported>Kevmin |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::::{{Ping|Gatoclass}}It does actually. That is found in the table on page two of the paper where Kania lists the specimens examined in the study. The entry for ''E. irinae'' list five specimens and lists all of them as male.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 10:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC) | ::::{{Ping|Gatoclass}}It does actually. That is found in the table on page two of the paper where Kania lists the specimens examined in the study. The entry for ''E. irinae'' list five specimens and lists all of them as male.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 10:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::: Yes {{u|Kevmin}}, but the hook fact must be mentioned in the article itself, not just the source. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 10:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC) | ::::: Yes {{u|Kevmin}}, but the hook fact must be mentioned in the article itself, not just the source. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 10:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::::::It is there now, I see that it was not in the article for some reason.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 14:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC) | |
{{-}}[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations|{{#dateformat:September 2015|ym}}]]<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations|{{#dateformat:September 2015|ym}}]]<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 14:56, 14 October 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Elephantomyia irinae
- ... that, when described, at least five males of the crane fly Elephantomyia irinae (pictured) were known from Baltic amber?
- Reviewed: Dysidea arenaria
- Comment: Coren bot notice is a false positive of a bad wiki mirror. :-/
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 20:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC).
I have returned this from prep as I cannot see any mention of "six males" of the species anywhere in the article. Gatoclass (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)- Template:U please respond. Gatoclass (talk) 12:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:PingCorrected, I somehow transposed five specimens with six species when writing the hook. there are five specimens known.--Kevmin § 13:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U, it still doesn't mention that all five specimens are male. Gatoclass (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:PingIt does actually. That is found in the table on page two of the paper where Kania lists the specimens examined in the study. The entry for E. irinae list five specimens and lists all of them as male.--Kevmin § 10:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U, it still doesn't mention that all five specimens are male. Gatoclass (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
