Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ethel Weed"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mary Mark Ockerbloom
(ffixed)
imported>Mary Mark Ockerbloom
Line 23: Line 23:
 
::::{{ping|Nvvchar}} What do you think? [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 18:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 
::::{{ping|Nvvchar}} What do you think? [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 18:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 
:::::* The dates in the first section any way need verification as they are not repeated in the rest of the article. The section as presented now cannot be considered as a lead section'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 01:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 
:::::* The dates in the first section any way need verification as they are not repeated in the rest of the article. The section as presented now cannot be considered as a lead section'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 01:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
:::::* I've added section headings and citations as needed to address these issues.  [[User:Mary Mark Ockerbloom|Mary Mark Ockerbloom]] ([[User talk:Mary Mark Ockerbloom|talk]]) 06:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
+
:::::* [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  I've added section headings and citations as needed to address these issues.  [[User:Mary Mark Ockerbloom|Mary Mark Ockerbloom]] ([[User talk:Mary Mark Ockerbloom|talk]]) 06:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 06:12, 27 April 2016

Ethel Weed

Created by Kaldari (talk). Self-nominated at 06:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article is long enough at 1703 ch and posted by due date. However, the first section of the article needs a citation. Hook is interesting. Text is neutral and there are no copy vio issues. QPQ done.Nvvchar. 13:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
The first section is basically a summary/lead (although the article isn't yet divided into sections). There should be adequate citations to back it up in the rest of the article (per WP:LEADCITE). Kaldari (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Template:Ping What do you think? Kaldari (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
  • The dates in the first section any way need verification as they are not repeated in the rest of the article. The section as presented now cannot be considered as a lead sectionNvvchar. 01:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg I've added section headings and citations as needed to address these issues. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)