Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Euglossa dilemma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>AfadsBad |
imported>BlueMoonset (full review needed) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*'''Note to reviewers''' Issues with this article will be resolved on the talk page, a good idea. The article is not yet ready for the main page until further issues are resolved. --([[User:AfadsBad|AfadsBad]] ([[User talk:AfadsBad|talk]]) 15:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)) | *'''Note to reviewers''' Issues with this article will be resolved on the talk page, a good idea. The article is not yet ready for the main page until further issues are resolved. --([[User:AfadsBad|AfadsBad]] ([[User talk:AfadsBad|talk]]) 15:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)) | ||
| + | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed of both articles and the hook. I don't see any evidence of outstanding issues in either article or their talk pages. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 01:22, 28 March 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Euglossa dilemma, Ficus altissima
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Euglossa dilemma
- Ficus altissima )
- ... that the green orchid bee (pictured) has assisted the council tree to become invasive in Florida?
- Reviewed: Goethe Oak
- Comment: The Goethe Oak nomination covers three articles.
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 12:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC).
- Comment Please do not change the information in the source. I have added a "failed verification" template. --(AfadsBad (talk) 15:03, 12 March 2014 (UTC))
- This matter has been resolved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note to reviewers Issues with this article will be resolved on the talk page, a good idea. The article is not yet ready for the main page until further issues are resolved. --(AfadsBad (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC))
Full review needed of both articles and the hook. I don't see any evidence of outstanding issues in either article or their talk pages. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
