Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Federal Emergency Plan D-Minus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>PFHLai (to P5) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Created by [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]). Self-nominated at 02:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]). Self-nominated at 02:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | < | + | <br />'''QPQ:''' [[Template:Did you know nominations/Phasmatodea]] |
| − | :* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] New and long enough, all non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, QPQ review performed, checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Federal+Emergency+Plan+D-Minus&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1]). The only problem is that none of the sources seem to refer to this specifically as a "contingency plan". <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|< | + | :* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] New and long enough, all non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, QPQ review performed, checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Federal+Emergency+Plan+D-Minus&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1]). The only problem is that none of the sources seem to refer to this specifically as a "contingency plan". <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:smaller">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 12:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC) |
:::[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]] - no problem; I thought that part was self-evident by the fact we're all still here, but I've deleted the word "contingency" thoughout. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 12:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | :::[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]] - no problem; I thought that part was self-evident by the fact we're all still here, but I've deleted the word "contingency" thoughout. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 12:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. Content of the hook is now fully backed, with an inline citation to a reliable source in the article. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|< | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. Content of the hook is now fully backed, with an inline citation to a reliable source in the article. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:smaller">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 12:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 23:24, 7 March 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Federal Emergency Plan D-Minus
- ... that Federal Emergency Plan D-Minus was a U.S. government plan for recovery efforts in the aftermath of a devastating nuclear attack?
Created by LavaBaron (talk). Self-nominated at 02:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC).
QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Phasmatodea
New and long enough, all non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, QPQ review performed, checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g. [1]). The only problem is that none of the sources seem to refer to this specifically as a "contingency plan". North America1000 12:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- North America - no problem; I thought that part was self-evident by the fact we're all still here, but I've deleted the word "contingency" thoughout. LavaBaron (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Good to go. Content of the hook is now fully backed, with an inline citation to a reliable source in the article. North America1000 12:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)