Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fenestraja plutonia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Noswall59 (reply) |
imported>Mandarax m (Add space after ellipsis) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | * ...that in [[1891]] a single [[specimen (biology)|specimen]], supposedly of '''[[Fenestraja plutonia|Underworld windowskate]]''', was collected from the [[California]] coast, even though the [[skate (fish)|skate]] is overwhelmingly [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]]? | + | * ... that in [[1891]] a single [[specimen (biology)|specimen]], supposedly of '''[[Fenestraja plutonia|Underworld windowskate]]''', was collected from the [[California]] coast, even though the [[skate (fish)|skate]] is overwhelmingly [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]]? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> |
Revision as of 23:03, 2 March 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Fenestraja plutonia
- ... that in 1891 a single specimen, supposedly of Underworld windowskate, was collected from the California coast, even though the skate is overwhelmingly Atlantic?
Created by Ryan shell (talk). Self nominated at 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
- I'll review this. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
- Article: The content is long enough (>3000 characters), new enough (created 2 March), cites sources throughout, doesn't appear to contain copyrighted text.
- Hook: you ought to cite the actual specimen ([1]). The hook is interesting enough and short enough. I am not sure how grammatical this is: "a single specimen, supposedly an Underworld windowskate, was collected". Should it be specimen "of" instead of "an"?
- Other: QPQ checks out. No image used.
Other than the grammar niggle above, this looks ready to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
- Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. Ryan shell (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)