Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fenestraja plutonia"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
m (Add space after ellipsis)
imported>Noswall59
(emboldening second opinion request)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
:[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Other than the grammar niggle above, this looks ready to go. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 16:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
 
:[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Other than the grammar niggle above, this looks ready to go. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 16:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
 
::Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 
::Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
:::Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will ask for a second opinion on the talk-page. Well done, —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
+
:::Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will '''ask for a second opinion''' on the talk-page. Well done, —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:10, 3 March 2015

Fenestraja plutonia

Created by Ryan shell (talk). Self nominated at 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC).

I'll review this. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
Article: The content is long enough (>3000 characters), new enough (created 2 March), cites sources throughout, doesn't appear to contain copyrighted text.
Hook: you ought to cite the actual specimen ([1]). The hook is interesting enough and short enough. I am not sure how grammatical this is: "a single specimen, supposedly an Underworld windowskate, was collected". Should it be specimen "of" instead of "an"?
Other: QPQ checks out. No image used.
Symbol question.svg Other than the grammar niggle above, this looks ready to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. Ryan shell (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will ask for a second opinion on the talk-page. Well done, —Noswall59 (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC).