Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/First Church in Albany (Reformed)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Case (respond to Gerda) |
imported>Gerda Arendt (appr) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Good expansion, good sources! The picture is free and good. Minor questions: the hook is sourced to the church's website, which says that the 300th anniversary and the visit of Wilhelmina happened in 1942, but not that she attended the services. - I don't understand "Five years later the church was formally incorporated itself, as the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church in the City of Albany." - I would prefer to see the bolding for redirect South Dutch Church in the lead. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 17:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | :[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Good expansion, good sources! The picture is free and good. Minor questions: the hook is sourced to the church's website, which says that the 300th anniversary and the visit of Wilhelmina happened in 1942, but not that she attended the services. - I don't understand "Five years later the church was formally incorporated itself, as the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church in the City of Albany." - I would prefer to see the bolding for redirect South Dutch Church in the lead. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 17:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Sorry to be so delayed in responding, Gerda—unusually, I've got a lot of hooks in the queue so I don't have just this one to focus on for once.<p>I have reworded the hook to be more in accord with the source and will appropriately edit the article. Thanks. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 18:08, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | ::Sorry to be so delayed in responding, Gerda—unusually, I've got a lot of hooks in the queue so I don't have just this one to focus on for once.<p>I have reworded the hook to be more in accord with the source and will appropriately edit the article. Thanks. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 18:08, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] (next time, please write an ALT, to keep the history od the discussion. - I still don't know what "was formally incorporated itself" is supposed to mean.) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 22:55, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 7 March 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
First Church in Albany (Reformed)
- ... that Queen Wilhelmina visited the First Church in Albany (pictured), the second-oldest congregation in New York, on the occasion of its 300th anniversary?
- Reviewed: United States biological defense program
- Comment: I believe this counts as a fivefold text expansion.
5x expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nominated at 03:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC).
Good expansion, good sources! The picture is free and good. Minor questions: the hook is sourced to the church's website, which says that the 300th anniversary and the visit of Wilhelmina happened in 1942, but not that she attended the services. - I don't understand "Five years later the church was formally incorporated itself, as the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church in the City of Albany." - I would prefer to see the bolding for redirect South Dutch Church in the lead. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to be so delayed in responding, Gerda—unusually, I've got a lot of hooks in the queue so I don't have just this one to focus on for once.
I have reworded the hook to be more in accord with the source and will appropriately edit the article. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
(next time, please write an ALT, to keep the history od the discussion. - I still don't know what "was formally incorporated itself" is supposed to mean.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to be so delayed in responding, Gerda—unusually, I've got a lot of hooks in the queue so I don't have just this one to focus on for once.
