Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Columbus, Ohio"
imported>Footlessmouse (my review) |
imported>Footlessmouse (mark with DYKtick) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
| − | + | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was just promoted to GA, is long enough, is not featured in the news, appropriate inline citations given, provides citations for direct quotes. I think that alt 1 is much better than the first, but it is not stated explicitly in the article, can you work it, or a close paraphrasing, into the lead? No dispute templates, remains neutral, and the only plagiarism complaints from turnitin relate to the direct quotes and common phrases, so is good there as well. Overall, I very much support Alt 1 to be included as a DYK, it is interesting and timely. I request you add a close paraphrasing into the lead, though, so as to satisfy all requirements. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC) | |
| + | |||
| + | * I am marking as DKY ready. Although I believe the statement should be worked into the lead, the information is already in the article; it is just phrased in a different way, so I believe it still qualifies. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:40, 17 October 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Flag of Columbus, Ohio
- ... that the government of Columbus, Ohio inexplicably used a different city flag design, even though a different one had already been approved? Source: "By at least as early as 1965, however, the city flag on display in council chambers was very different from the one adopted..." (American City Flags by Ted Kaye)
- ALT1:... that the city flag of Columbus, Ohio is undergoing a redesign process due to its heavy use of Christopher Columbus imagery? Source: "The seven-person body motioned to move forward with a number of tasks — including finding a replacement for [Christopher Columbus'] statue, as well as redesigning the Columbus flag and seal — in tandem with that decision [removing Columbus' statue]." (Art Commissioners Reflect on Statue Removal, Flag Redesign and More by Taijuan Moorman, published on June 1, 2020)
Improved to Good Article status by Jordano53 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC).
Article was just promoted to GA, is long enough, is not featured in the news, appropriate inline citations given, provides citations for direct quotes. I think that alt 1 is much better than the first, but it is not stated explicitly in the article, can you work it, or a close paraphrasing, into the lead? No dispute templates, remains neutral, and the only plagiarism complaints from turnitin relate to the direct quotes and common phrases, so is good there as well. Overall, I very much support Alt 1 to be included as a DYK, it is interesting and timely. I request you add a close paraphrasing into the lead, though, so as to satisfy all requirements. Footlessmouse (talk) 08:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- I am marking as DKY ready. Although I believe the statement should be worked into the lead, the information is already in the article; it is just phrased in a different way, so I believe it still qualifies. Footlessmouse (talk) 08:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
