Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fred Keenor"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Muboshgu
(full review)
imported>Kosack
(+ reply)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
::*Yes, I can. Thanks for the reminder. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::*Yes, I can. Thanks for the reminder. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::* Article has 26,117 characters, meeting the five-fold expansion requirement. Many sources are offline, so AGF on their content and not being plagiarized. An online source supports the main proposed hook. The section on the participation in the Battle of the Somme is missing an inline citation, and that's all that's holding me up from fully approving this article. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::* Article has 26,117 characters, meeting the five-fold expansion requirement. Many sources are offline, so AGF on their content and not being plagiarized. An online source supports the main proposed hook. The section on the participation in the Battle of the Somme is missing an inline citation, and that's all that's holding me up from fully approving this article. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 +
:::* {{replyto|Muboshgu}} The ref for the quote underneath also covered the part that was cited as needing a ref. I've split the ref to cover both now. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 22:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:06, 15 August 2016

Fred Keenor

5x expanded by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 14:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Article was at 5,111 characters prior to expansion, meaning a full 5x would require 25,555 characters. At the present revision, it is 20,391, which is 3.9x. It's a solid expansion that is to your credit, but so far it falls short of the fivefold expansion required. You do still have time in the expansion window to continue it, if you can. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Apologies for that, I seem to have miscalculated the prose expansion somehow. I'll try to expand it a bit more to meet the requirements in time. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 08:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
  • It looks to be, yes. Can you fix that {{cn}} tag? I'll give it a closer review later today. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes, I can. Thanks for the reminder. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Article has 26,117 characters, meeting the five-fold expansion requirement. Many sources are offline, so AGF on their content and not being plagiarized. An online source supports the main proposed hook. The section on the participation in the Battle of the Somme is missing an inline citation, and that's all that's holding me up from fully approving this article. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Template:Replyto The ref for the quote underneath also covered the part that was cited as needing a ref. I've split the ref to cover both now. Kosack (talk) 22:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)