Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Furcifer angeli, Furcifer balteatus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Splitting nomination suggested) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (ALT2 suggested.) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*... that despite having a natural habitat of forests, the '''[[Furcifer angeli|Angel's Chameleon]]''' can be found near roads and human habitations? | *... that despite having a natural habitat of forests, the '''[[Furcifer angeli|Angel's Chameleon]]''' can be found near roads and human habitations? | ||
*[[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]) 23:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC) | *[[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]) 23:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::Bluemoonset makes good points here. I have found a licensed image and done some expansion of ''[[Furcifer balteatus]]''. It is difficult to find a suitable interesting hook for these two chameleon species so I suggest the nomination is split. The hook for ''Furcifer balteatus'' could be: | + | :::Bluemoonset makes good points here. I have found a licensed image and done some expansion of ''[[Furcifer balteatus]]''. It is difficult to find a suitable interesting single hook for these two chameleon species so I suggest the nomination is split. The hook for ''Furcifer balteatus'' could be: |
:* '''ALT1''' ... that forest degradation and illegal exports threaten the survival of the '''[[Furcifer balteatus|Rainforest Chameleon]]'''? [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC) | :* '''ALT1''' ... that forest degradation and illegal exports threaten the survival of the '''[[Furcifer balteatus|Rainforest Chameleon]]'''? [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::For the ''[[Furcifer angeli]]'' article the hook could be: | ||
| + | :* '''ALT2''' ... that despite the destruction of its forest habitat, the '''[[Furcifer angeli|Angel's Chameleon]]''' has adapted to life in the vicinity of humans? | ||
| + | :::or | ||
| + | :* '''ALT3''' ... that despite the destruction of its forest habitat, the '''[[Furcifer angeli|Angel's Chameleon]]''' has adapted to life near roads and villages? [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 18 December 2012
Furcifer angeli, Furcifer balteatus
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Furcifer angeli
- Furcifer balteatus )
- ... that Angel's Chameleon and the Rainforest Chameleon are both endemic to Madagascar?
Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 12:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
The hook is not interesting or surprising; lots of animals are endemic to the country in which they are found. Can a better hook be found? Sasata (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- The two articles are different. I have two hooks, each one for each article:
- For Angel's Chameleon: ... that the Angel's Chameleon is a "drably coloured" version of the Panther Chameleon?
- For Rainforest Chameleon: ... that the green-coloured Rainforest Chameleon is endangered?
- Hope it helps. — ΛΧΣ21™ 06:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- The two articles are different. I have two hooks, each one for each article:
The proposed Rainforest Chameleon hook is not adequately supported by the source. Indeed, the first two sentences of the Description section are dubious not only because they start "In some species", which seems to contradict the article being about a single species called Furcifer balteatus. Worse, the sources are pictures without description, making these descriptions creations of the author here, who can have no idea whether these are representative pictures (that is, typical of how the chameleon, which may well change color a lot, looks), and these sites warn that the photographer's identification hasn't actually been confirmed by experts. So we have no secondary reliable source for "green". For the Angel's Chameleon, this description was from an arbitrary photographer rather than from the official description/identification of the species based on a nighttime photograph (rather than its appearance during the day), so I have to wonder how accurate it is. I'm not sure, though, that a "according to amateur photographer John Sullivan, Angel's Chameleon is a "drably coloured" version of the Panther Chameleon?" hook would fly. If there isn't going to be an effort to come up with interesting, accurate hooks—together or apart—for these articles, then we should probably let them go. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:33, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- ... that the Rainforest Chameleon is to be highly desirable in the pet trade?
- ... that despite having a natural habitat of forests, the Angel's Chameleon can be found near roads and human habitations?
- Thine Antique Pen (talk) 23:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- Bluemoonset makes good points here. I have found a licensed image and done some expansion of Furcifer balteatus. It is difficult to find a suitable interesting single hook for these two chameleon species so I suggest the nomination is split. The hook for Furcifer balteatus could be:
- ALT1 ... that forest degradation and illegal exports threaten the survival of the Rainforest Chameleon? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:32, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- For the Furcifer angeli article the hook could be:
- ALT2 ... that despite the destruction of its forest habitat, the Angel's Chameleon has adapted to life in the vicinity of humans?
- or
- ALT3 ... that despite the destruction of its forest habitat, the Angel's Chameleon has adapted to life near roads and villages? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC)