Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Gesomyrmex germanicus"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Spirit of Eagle
imported>Spirit of Eagle
Line 24: Line 24:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]Article has been expanded 5x (and then some) within the last week, and has a prose section in excess of 1,500 characters. The article is neutral and cites sources. None of the sources used in the article are available online, so I’ll assume good faith and trust that the article is free of close paraphrasing. The hook has less than 200 characters, is interesting and neutral and is derived from a section with a citation. You’ve also reviewed another DYK hook. All in all, this hook is good to go.[[User:Spirit of Eagle|Spirit of Eagle]] ([[User talk:Spirit of Eagle|talk]]) 02:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]Article has been expanded 5x (and then some) within the last week, and has a prose section in excess of 1,500 characters. The article is neutral and cites sources. None of the sources used in the article are available online, so I’ll assume good faith and trust that the article is free of close paraphrasing. The hook has less than 200 characters, is interesting and neutral and is derived from a section with a citation. You’ve also reviewed another DYK hook. The photograph is used in the article and is in fact under an appropriate creative commons license. All in all, this hook is good to go.[[User:Spirit of Eagle|Spirit of Eagle]] ([[User talk:Spirit of Eagle|talk]]) 02:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 02:56, 9 March 2015

Gesomyrmex germanicus

fossil Gesomyrmex germanicus

5x expanded by Kevmin (talk), Gsautter (talk). Nominated by Kevmin (talk) at 02:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svgArticle has been expanded 5x (and then some) within the last week, and has a prose section in excess of 1,500 characters. The article is neutral and cites sources. None of the sources used in the article are available online, so I’ll assume good faith and trust that the article is free of close paraphrasing. The hook has less than 200 characters, is interesting and neutral and is derived from a section with a citation. You’ve also reviewed another DYK hook. The photograph is used in the article and is in fact under an appropriate creative commons license. All in all, this hook is good to go.Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)