Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Glasser v. United States"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Muboshgu |
imported>Orlady (moved to prep 3) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from February 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 00:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)<br />}} |
====Glasser v. United States==== | ====Glasser v. United States==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Glasser v. United States|Glasser v. United States}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Glasser v. United States|Glasser v. United States}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{*mp}}... that '''''[[Glasser v. United States]]''''' was both the first [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case to hold that an attorney [[conflict of interest]] violated the [[Assistance of Counsel Clause]] and the first case to hold that juries must be drawn from a "[[jury selection in the United States|cross-section of the community]]"? | {{*mp}}... that '''''[[Glasser v. United States]]''''' was both the first [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case to hold that an attorney [[conflict of interest]] violated the [[Assistance of Counsel Clause]] and the first case to hold that juries must be drawn from a "[[jury selection in the United States|cross-section of the community]]"? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Savidan|Savidan]] ([[User talk:Savidan|talk]]). Self nom at 03:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Savidan|Savidan]] ([[User talk:Savidan|talk]]). Self nom at 03:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:*Reviewed: [[Template:Did you know nominations/Washington v. Texas|Washington v. Texas]] | :*Reviewed: [[Template:Did you know nominations/Washington v. Texas|Washington v. Texas]] | ||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new and meets all DYK criteria. Only problem here is that the hook is too long. It may not be possible to include both "firsts" in this hook and keep it under 200 characters. ALT1 is closer, but still over 200. IAR? – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new and meets all DYK criteria. Only problem here is that the hook is too long. It may not be possible to include both "firsts" in this hook and keep it under 200 characters. ALT1 is closer, but still over 200. IAR? – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | :*'''ALT1''' ... that '''''[[Glasser v. United States]]''''' was the first [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case to hold that an attorney [[conflict of interest]] violated the [[Assistance of Counsel Clause]] and that juries must be drawn from a "[[jury selection in the United States|cross-section of the community]]"? | + | :*'''ALT1''' ... that '''''[[Glasser v. United States]]''''' was the first [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case to hold that an attorney [[conflict of interest]] violated the [[Assistance of Counsel Clause]] and that juries must be drawn from a "[[jury selection in the United States|cross-section of the community]]"?{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 00:42, 4 March 2012
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Glasser v. United States
- ... that Glasser v. United States was both the first U.S. Supreme Court case to hold that an attorney conflict of interest violated the Assistance of Counsel Clause and the first case to hold that juries must be drawn from a "cross-section of the community"?
Created/expanded by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 03:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Washington v. Texas
Article is new and meets all DYK criteria. Only problem here is that the hook is too long. It may not be possible to include both "firsts" in this hook and keep it under 200 characters. ALT1 is closer, but still over 200. IAR? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Glasser v. United States was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to hold that an attorney conflict of interest violated the Assistance of Counsel Clause and that juries must be drawn from a "cross-section of the community"?