Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Goodman Beaver"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Graeme Bartlett (some checks are done) |
imported>BlueMoonset (query) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:*<!--Make first comment here--> | :*<!--Make first comment here--> | ||
:*Article is big enough, and new enough. Citations are complex but all look to be there. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 20:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC) | :*Article is big enough, and new enough. Citations are complex but all look to be there. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 20:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::*What are the issues, then, that kept you from giving it a tick of approval? Is there more reviewing to do, like close paraphrasing checks? [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 01:43, 27 November 2012
Goodman Beaver
- ... that a 1961 comics satire involving Archie characters in a hedonistic Roman-style orgy provoked a lawsuit by Archie Comics that resulted in the parody's creators handing over copyright to the work?
- ALT1:... that in 1962, Hugh Hefner accepted a comic strip feature for Playboy, provided the male protagonist was transformed into a large-breasted female?
- Reviewed: Dendropsophus phlebodes
- Comment: File:Goodman Goes Playboy page 6 panel 4 detail (Goodman Beaver's face).jpg might be a good alternate image if the one provided is deemed too hard to view at that size.
Created/expanded by Curly Turkey (talk). Self nom at 03:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Article is big enough, and new enough. Citations are complex but all look to be there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- What are the issues, then, that kept you from giving it a tick of approval? Is there more reviewing to do, like close paraphrasing checks? BlueMoonset (talk) 01:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC)