Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Gordon Falcon (Royal Navy officer)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Frietjes (Clean up duplicate template arguments using findargdups: repairing duplicate |page =;) |
imported>Dumelow (review) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Ykraps|Ykraps]], review follows: article moved to mainspace 16 February; article is of good length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable (largely offline) sources; no overly close paraphrasing from the online sources, AGF this is the case for the offline sources; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, cited to an offline source - AGF that this backs it up; image is freely and appropriately licensed (from a 1900 book); a QPQ has been completed. Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 15:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 15:16, 28 February 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
- ... that Gordon Falcon was one of the British officers sent aboard USS Chesapeake to search for Royal Navy deserters during the Chesapeake–Leopard affair? Source:Bohn, Henry George (1853). Bohn's extra volume (Vol.VII}. p. 199.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Armorer (Star Wars)
- Comment: Moved from user space on 16 Feb 2020
Moved to mainspace by Ykraps (talk). Self-nominated at 09:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC).
Hi Ykraps, review follows: article moved to mainspace 16 February; article is of good length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable (largely offline) sources; no overly close paraphrasing from the online sources, AGF this is the case for the offline sources; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, cited to an offline source - AGF that this backs it up; image is freely and appropriately licensed (from a 1900 book); a QPQ has been completed. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 15:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
