Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Gothic War (535–554)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Magic links bot m (Replace magic links with templates per local RfC and MediaWiki RfC) |
imported>Dumelow (review) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Gog the Mild|Gog]], review follows: Good article review passed 21 June; article is of a good length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; One of the image captions: "The Porta Asinaria, through which the East Roman army entered Rome." introduces information that is not provided (or referenced) in the article, it might be worth looking at this, particularly if you want to take the article further; QPQ has been done; hook is interesting and within policy; I don't know how common "sack" is to the average reader, it might be worth added a piped link to [[looting]] to make it clearer; the second sack of Rome (third siege) is not referred to in the article which only states "In the third siege of Rome in 549, Totila captured it again and made peace overtures but these were rejected by Justinian". Otherwise good to go - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 09:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 09:11, 22 June 2018
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Gothic War (535–554)
- ... that during the 6th century Gothic War Rome was besieged three times by the Goths, falling and being sacked twice? Source: Norwich, John Julius (1990). Byzantium: The Early Centuries. London: Penguin. ISBN 9780140114478, p. 218-9; 248; 249-50.
- Reviewed: Up to date with QPQ. Cashing in Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Black Buck
Improved to Good Article status by Gog the Mild (talk). Self-nominated at 16:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC).
Hi Gog, review follows: Good article review passed 21 June; article is of a good length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; One of the image captions: "The Porta Asinaria, through which the East Roman army entered Rome." introduces information that is not provided (or referenced) in the article, it might be worth looking at this, particularly if you want to take the article further; QPQ has been done; hook is interesting and within policy; I don't know how common "sack" is to the average reader, it might be worth added a piped link to looting to make it clearer; the second sack of Rome (third siege) is not referred to in the article which only states "In the third siege of Rome in 549, Totila captured it again and made peace overtures but these were rejected by Justinian". Otherwise good to go - Dumelow (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)