Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Admiral Thrawn"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>TAnthony
(DYK nom for Grand Admiral Thrawn)
 
imported>DYKReviewBot
m (Automatically reviewing nomination: No issues found (Problems? Report it.))
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
 +
<!-- Automated review by User:DYKReviewBot -->
 +
<includeonly>{{hidden begin|title=</includeonly>{{*}}[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] '''No issues found with article, ready for human review.'''<includeonly>}}</includeonly>
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> This article was [[Talk:Grand Admiral Thrawn/GA1|Listed]] as a Good Article on 21:43, 26 August 2016
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> This article meets the DYK criteria at 18394 characters
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 +
**<span style="color:purple;" alt="Purple question mark" title="Purple question mark">'''''?'''''</span> A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 39.4% confidence. ([https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Grand+Admiral+Thrawn&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1 confirm])
 +
***Note to reviewers: There is '''low confidence''' in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do ''not'' constitute a copyright violation.<includeonly>{{hidden end}}</includeonly>
 +
<includeonly>{{hidden begin|title=</includeonly>{{*}}'''No overall issues detected'''<includeonly>}}</includeonly>
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 191 characters
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> [[User:TAnthony|TAnthony]] has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II – An 80th Birthday Portrait]] was performed for this nomination.
 +
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.<includeonly>{{hidden end}}</includeonly> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 00:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 +
<!-- End automated review -->
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:59, 29 August 2016

Grand Admiral Thrawn

Improved to Good Article status by TAnthony (talk). Self-nominated at 00:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC).


  1. REDIRECT Template:•Symbol redirect vote 4.svg No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article was Listed as a Good Article on 21:43, 26 August 2016
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 18394 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 39.4% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  1. REDIRECT Template:•No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 00:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)