Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Hanna Stjärne"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(signing sorry)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(OK, but article has an problem)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:*''' ALT 1''' ... that '''[[Hanna Stjärne]]''' ''(pictured)'', the youngest-ever CEO of a Swedish national radio channel, has now been named CEO of [[Sveriges Television]]?[[Special:Contributions/184.147.131.89|184.147.131.89]] ([[User talk:184.147.131.89|talk]]) 20:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
+
:*<s>''' ALT 1''' ... that '''[[Hanna Stjärne]]''' ''(pictured)'', the youngest-ever CEO of a Swedish national radio channel, has now been named CEO of [[Sveriges Television]]?</s>[[Special:Contributions/184.147.131.89|184.147.131.89]] ([[User talk:184.147.131.89|talk]]) 20:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article is long enough and new enough. Going for the original hook because one of the facts for ALT1 is not born out by the #5 reference used at the end of the sentence. The article is neutral and I don't see any close paraphrasing. The article mentions the year 200, but should this be 2000 or 2001? This is also referenced to #5, but the fact cited is not mentioned there! [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:21, 3 November 2014

Hanna Stjärne

Hanna Stjärne 2014

  • ... that journalist Hanna Stjärne (pictured) in September 2014 was announced to be the new CEO of Sveriges Television and that she would take the post within six months?
  • Reviewed:Caitlin Doughty

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self nominated at 21:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg This article is long enough and new enough. Going for the original hook because one of the facts for ALT1 is not born out by the #5 reference used at the end of the sentence. The article is neutral and I don't see any close paraphrasing. The article mentions the year 200, but should this be 2000 or 2001? This is also referenced to #5, but the fact cited is not mentioned there! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)