Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Hans Raj (approver)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Havradim
(Striking discarded hooks and noting ALT1 as second choice)
imported>Mandarax
m (Add space after ellipsis)
Line 43: Line 43:
  
 
::Thanks for reviewing {{reply|Havradim}}....I don't mind which hook, although ALT2 I thought might work. Everyone appears to agree he was suspicious. I tweaked yours a little to make Alt3a. Someone may have an alternative suggestion.
 
::Thanks for reviewing {{reply|Havradim}}....I don't mind which hook, although ALT2 I thought might work. Everyone appears to agree he was suspicious. I tweaked yours a little to make Alt3a. Someone may have an alternative suggestion.
::<s>'''ALT3a'''...Historians have disputed whether '''[[Hans Raj (approver)|Hans Raj]]''', who turned state's witness for the [[British Raj]], had been a police agent all along?</s> <small>Hans Raj’s role, however, is contested history. Some Indian historians have argued that Jallianwala Bagh was a planned massacre, alleging that Hans Raj was a British spy who collaborated with Dyer, who wanted to punish Indians for the violence that had preceded the massacre ... Most British historians, however, either make little mention of Hans Raj or play down his role in the incident...Most popular retellings of the incident—school textbooks...etc.. or films and documentaries—simply omit Hans Raj[https://caravanmagazine.in/perspectives/what-we-chose-not-remember-centenary-jallianwala-bagh]…believed by some historians that Hans Raj was in league with local police[https://books.google.co.uk/books?redir_esc=y&id=Mk7ptwEACAAJ&q=satypal#v=onepage&q=Hans%20Raj&f=false]</small>[[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]) 13:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
+
::<s>'''ALT3a'''...Historians have disputed whether '''[[Hans Raj (approver)|Hans Raj]]''', who turned state's witness for the [[British Raj]], had been a police agent all along?</s> <small>Hans Raj's role, however, is contested history. Some Indian historians have argued that Jallianwala Bagh was a planned massacre, alleging that Hans Raj was a British spy who collaborated with Dyer, who wanted to punish Indians for the violence that had preceded the massacre&nbsp;... Most British historians, however, either make little mention of Hans Raj or play down his role in the incident&nbsp;... Most popular retellings of the incident—school textbooks&nbsp;... etc.. or films and documentaries—simply omit Hans Raj[https://caravanmagazine.in/perspectives/what-we-chose-not-remember-centenary-jallianwala-bagh]&nbsp;... believed by some historians that Hans Raj was in league with local police[https://books.google.co.uk/books?redir_esc=y&id=Mk7ptwEACAAJ&q=satypal#v=onepage&q=Hans%20Raj&f=false]</small>[[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]) 13:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::Thanks for adding inline citations {{u|Whispyhistory}}. I will do some further tweaking to add more accurate terminology:
 
:::Thanks for adding inline citations {{u|Whispyhistory}}. I will do some further tweaking to add more accurate terminology:
:::'''ALT3b'''...that historians have not concluded whether '''[[Hans Raj (approver)|Hans Raj]]''' turned [[Turn state's evidence|state's evidence]] for the [[British Raj]], or if he had been a police agent all along?
+
:::'''ALT3b''' ... that historians have not concluded whether '''[[Hans Raj (approver)|Hans Raj]]''' turned [[Turn state's evidence|state's evidence]] for the [[British Raj]], or if he had been a police agent all along?
 
:::[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] I think ALT2 leaves too much to the imagination without framing what the subject was all about. At least as far as I am concerned, ALT3b is good to go. ALT1 would be my second choice. [[User:Havradim|Havradim]] ([[User talk:Havradim|talk]]) 13:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] I think ALT2 leaves too much to the imagination without framing what the subject was all about. At least as far as I am concerned, ALT3b is good to go. ALT1 would be my second choice. [[User:Havradim|Havradim]] ([[User talk:Havradim|talk]]) 13:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:39, 26 December 2019

Hans Raj (approver)

Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 11:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
Thanks for reviewing Template:Reply....I don't mind which hook, although ALT2 I thought might work. Everyone appears to agree he was suspicious. I tweaked yours a little to make Alt3a. Someone may have an alternative suggestion.
ALT3a...Historians have disputed whether Hans Raj, who turned state's witness for the British Raj, had been a police agent all along? Hans Raj's role, however, is contested history. Some Indian historians have argued that Jallianwala Bagh was a planned massacre, alleging that Hans Raj was a British spy who collaborated with Dyer, who wanted to punish Indians for the violence that had preceded the massacre ... Most British historians, however, either make little mention of Hans Raj or play down his role in the incident ... Most popular retellings of the incident—school textbooks ... etc.. or films and documentaries—simply omit Hans Raj[6] ... believed by some historians that Hans Raj was in league with local police[7]Whispyhistory (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for adding inline citations Template:U. I will do some further tweaking to add more accurate terminology:
ALT3b ... that historians have not concluded whether Hans Raj turned state's evidence for the British Raj, or if he had been a police agent all along?
Symbol voting keep.svg I think ALT2 leaves too much to the imagination without framing what the subject was all about. At least as far as I am concerned, ALT3b is good to go. ALT1 would be my second choice. Havradim (talk) 13:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)