Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Henri-Edmond Cross"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr
(good to go.)
imported>Mandarax
(Thanks)
Line 42: Line 42:
  
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. Sorry about the problems.  My fault. :( --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. Sorry about the problems.  My fault. :( --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 +
:No problem – there are a ''lot'' of rules! Thanks for the review. Oh, and your mentioning the image licenses reminded me that I can use even better ones. They're currently life + 70 years; I'll go change them to life + 100 years. [[User:Mandarax|<font color="green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></font>]]&nbsp;<font color="blue">•</font>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<font color="999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</font>]] 02:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 02:14, 29 February 2012

Henri-Edmond Cross

Dormeuse nue dans la clairière by Henri-Edmond Cross, 1907

  • ... that painter Henri-Edmond Cross (example painting pictured) changed his name twice, each time to avoid confusion with a similarly-named artist?
  • Reviewed: Leichtgesinnte Flattergeister, BWV 181
  • Comment: DYKcheck fails, as it doesn't take into account the plagiarism which I removed (see the first edit on February 14). Please check expansion manually.

Created/expanded by Mandarax (talk). Self nom at 21:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Article has not been expanded five fold. --LauraHale (talk) 04:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Yes it has. See my comment above. The version which removed the plagiarism was 973 prose characters. It's currently 8304, an expansion of over eight and a half times. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 05:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Newnewss measures are:

  • been created (sandbox → mainspace is eligible); or
  • had its prose portion expanded at least fivefold; or
  • had its prose portion expanded at least twofold (only applies to BLPs that were completely unreferenced before expansion)

Expansion clock based on that as I understand it is this source here. If there was copyright and there is an exclusion, will finish the review but please cite where it says that expansions after copyright violation removed reset the expansion length. --LauraHale (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

  • The version you linked to is the one just prior to the one I linked to, which removed copyright violations. According to rule A4, copyright violations are excluded from expansion calculation. Thanks. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 10:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 21:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


---

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg on length being accurate. Plagiarism that had existed in the article removed. The current book sources are free of plagiarism. The hook related text in the article is supported by the book sources.
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article is fully supported by inline sources. Images on page have copyright tags that work. Article is neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted. Plagiarism spot check here and here does not give me any major cause for concern. --LauraHale (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. Sorry about the problems. My fault. :( --LauraHale (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

No problem – there are a lot of rules! Thanks for the review. Oh, and your mentioning the image licenses reminded me that I can use even better ones. They're currently life + 70 years; I'll go change them to life + 100 years. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 02:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)