Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Hu Die"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Zanhe
m (c/e)
imported>SusunW
Line 24: Line 24:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Assuming the expansion began on 24 February, text was at 2098, thus is long enough with 10497 for 5x expansion, and new enough. Does not appear to have close paraphrasing, is neutral and sources are cited. Article appears to be classed as a stub, which should be corrected and though I am able to verify the 2nd part of the hook in the article cited, the first part of the hook is not available on-line in the source given. I did find an alternative source for the information, [https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=jYYYQYK6FAYC&lpg=PA10&ots=hERWuVRIZl&dq=Hu%20die%20was%20mistress%20of%20%20Dai%20Li&pg=PA355#v=onepage&q=Hu%20die%20was%20mistress%20of%20%20Dai%20Li&f=false] Both images appear in commons listed as public domain. Interesting article! [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]) 23:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:56, 27 February 2015

Hu Die

Hu Die Hu Die

  • ... that "Movie Queen" Butterfly Wu (pictured) became the mistress of China's spy master Dai Li and the mother-in-law of President Li Zongren?
  • Reviewed: Chris Wu
  • Comment: Can't decide which photo is better, so listing both. For Women's History Month.

5x expanded by Zanhe (talk). Self nominated at 10:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svgAssuming the expansion began on 24 February, text was at 2098, thus is long enough with 10497 for 5x expansion, and new enough. Does not appear to have close paraphrasing, is neutral and sources are cited. Article appears to be classed as a stub, which should be corrected and though I am able to verify the 2nd part of the hook in the article cited, the first part of the hook is not available on-line in the source given. I did find an alternative source for the information, [1] Both images appear in commons listed as public domain. Interesting article! SusunW (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)