Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Iron Foot Jack"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mandarax m (subst:) |
imported>Panyd (Passed) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 21:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Iron Foot Jack==== | ====Iron Foot Jack==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Iron Foot Jack|Iron Foot Jack}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Iron Foot Jack|Iron Foot Jack}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that '''[[Iron Foot Jack]]''', "a more agreeable kind of [[Alistair Crowley]] in a poorer way of business", was an inspiration for a young [[Ian Dury]]? | * ... that '''[[Iron Foot Jack]]''', "a more agreeable kind of [[Alistair Crowley]] in a poorer way of business", was an inspiration for a young [[Ian Dury]]? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
:* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Iron Foot Jack]]''' appeared in Pathé's 1955 newsreel ''Soho Goes Gay''? | :* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Iron Foot Jack]]''' appeared in Pathé's 1955 newsreel ''Soho Goes Gay''? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': not a self-nom | :* ''Reviewed'': not a self-nom | ||
:* ''Comment'': more and better hooks welcome | :* ''Comment'': more and better hooks welcome | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) at 09:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) at 09:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was long enough when nominated, and is definitely long enough at present. Hook is 152 characters, so it's okay. I spot checked via Googling for copyright vios, with no duplication showing. However, I also spot-checked some quotations, with no match showing; due to lack of URLs in cites, I could not verify veracity of quotes, including the one in the hook. I do not know how to check image copyright, etcetera; however, I doubt the image will show well at 100x100 pixels resolution. | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was long enough when nominated, and is definitely long enough at present. Hook is 152 characters, so it's okay. I spot checked via Googling for copyright vios, with no duplication showing. However, I also spot-checked some quotations, with no match showing; due to lack of URLs in cites, I could not verify veracity of quotes, including the one in the hook. I do not know how to check image copyright, etcetera; however, I doubt the image will show well at 100x100 pixels resolution. | ||
:* As I am returning to DYK after some years away, I will recommend a more experienced editor sign off on this nomination.[[User:Georgejdorner|Georgejdorner]] ([[User talk:Georgejdorner|talk]]) 14:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | :* As I am returning to DYK after some years away, I will recommend a more experienced editor sign off on this nomination.[[User:Georgejdorner|Georgejdorner]] ([[User talk:Georgejdorner|talk]]) 14:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
::*The image won't be used anyway as it is fair use. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 14:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | ::*The image won't be used anyway as it is fair use. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 14:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | :::* Having committed several reviews since this one, I suppose I have become the more experienced editor. With the graphics question settled, this article is DYK material. I do believe the original hook is best.[[User:Georgejdorner|Georgejdorner]] ([[User talk:Georgejdorner|talk]]) 03:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC) | + | :::* Having committed several reviews since this one, I suppose I have become the more experienced editor. With the graphics question settled, this article is DYK material. I do believe the original hook is best.[[User:Georgejdorner|Georgejdorner]] ([[User talk:Georgejdorner|talk]]) 03:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− |
Latest revision as of 21:34, 21 October 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Iron Foot Jack
- ... that Iron Foot Jack, "a more agreeable kind of Alistair Crowley in a poorer way of business", was an inspiration for a young Ian Dury?
- ALT1:... that Iron Foot Jack appeared in Pathé's 1955 newsreel Soho Goes Gay?
- Reviewed: not a self-nom
- Comment: more and better hooks welcome
Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 09:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC).
Article was long enough when nominated, and is definitely long enough at present. Hook is 152 characters, so it's okay. I spot checked via Googling for copyright vios, with no duplication showing. However, I also spot-checked some quotations, with no match showing; due to lack of URLs in cites, I could not verify veracity of quotes, including the one in the hook. I do not know how to check image copyright, etcetera; however, I doubt the image will show well at 100x100 pixels resolution.
- As I am returning to DYK after some years away, I will recommend a more experienced editor sign off on this nomination.Georgejdorner (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- The image won't be used anyway as it is fair use. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Having committed several reviews since this one, I suppose I have become the more experienced editor. With the graphics question settled, this article is DYK material. I do believe the original hook is best.Georgejdorner (talk) 03:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)