Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/John F. Gaffney"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maile66 (Another hook, perhaps?) |
imported>Alansohn (reply re bad faith claim) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Could we please either use a hook not involving Trump, or delay putting this on the front page of Wikipedia until after the November 8 election, so as not to look like a violation of [[WP:DYKNOT]] {{tq|A means of advertising, or of promoting commercial or political causes. While it is fine to cover topics of commercial or political interest, DYK must not provide inappropriate advantage for such causes (e.g. during election campaigns or product launches).}} Right now, Trump's business deals and political affiliations are part of the campaign dialogues, both directions, and he's under investigation for same. Of course, Trump is a small part of this article, so maybe there could be a hook that doesn't mention him. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 15:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC) | [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Could we please either use a hook not involving Trump, or delay putting this on the front page of Wikipedia until after the November 8 election, so as not to look like a violation of [[WP:DYKNOT]] {{tq|A means of advertising, or of promoting commercial or political causes. While it is fine to cover topics of commercial or political interest, DYK must not provide inappropriate advantage for such causes (e.g. during election campaigns or product launches).}} Right now, Trump's business deals and political affiliations are part of the campaign dialogues, both directions, and he's under investigation for same. Of course, Trump is a small part of this article, so maybe there could be a hook that doesn't mention him. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 15:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :The hook stands on its own, is properly sourced and is the best hook of the article. If {{u|Maile66}} hadn't been making blatant bad faith assumptions about my motives and had taken a look at my recent editing history in systematically creating new articles for state legislators, perhaps the DYKNOT accusation would have been eliminated and the DYK nomination might have been evaluated on its merits, rather than on one editor's preconceptions. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be censored, but I'm willing to wait until November 9, if necessary, to deal with these bad faith allegations. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 15:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 18 September 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
John F. Gaffney
- ... that a 1994 John F. Gaffney proposal would have allowed Donald Trump to own four Atlantic City casino licenses, even though all three of his casino properties there had recent bankruptcy filings?
- Reviewed: Textile industry in China
Created by Alansohn (talk). Self-nominated at 13:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC).
Could we please either use a hook not involving Trump, or delay putting this on the front page of Wikipedia until after the November 8 election, so as not to look like a violation of WP:DYKNOT Template:Tq Right now, Trump's business deals and political affiliations are part of the campaign dialogues, both directions, and he's under investigation for same. Of course, Trump is a small part of this article, so maybe there could be a hook that doesn't mention him. — Maile (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The hook stands on its own, is properly sourced and is the best hook of the article. If Template:U hadn't been making blatant bad faith assumptions about my motives and had taken a look at my recent editing history in systematically creating new articles for state legislators, perhaps the DYKNOT accusation would have been eliminated and the DYK nomination might have been evaluated on its merits, rather than on one editor's preconceptions. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be censored, but I'm willing to wait until November 9, if necessary, to deal with these bad faith allegations. Alansohn (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)