Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/King's Chapel, Gibraltar"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Redtigerxyz
(+agf)
imported>Prioryman
(Fine by me!)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
:*'''Review 2''':
 
:*'''Review 2''':
 
:*<!--Make second review here--> [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] The article is referenced and not promotional. Hook is ok, but IMO the renaming to Queen's Chapel will make a more interesting hook. --[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 08:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 
:*<!--Make second review here--> [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] The article is referenced and not promotional. Hook is ok, but IMO the renaming to Queen's Chapel will make a more interesting hook. --[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 08:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 
+
::*I am fine with either hook; thanks for the review. I [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 09:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:09, 26 October 2012

King's Chapel, Gibraltar

Interior of King's Chapel, Gibraltar

  • ... that the 16th-century King's Chapel (interior pictured) was the first church built in Gibraltar after the city was conquered by Spain?
  • ALT ... that the 16th-century King's Chapel (interior pictured) was known as the Queen's Chapel during the reign of Queen Victoria? --Redtigerxyz Talk 08:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Prioryman (talk). Self nom at 00:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Note: fixed the piped article link, which was backwards, added hyphen, and removed Spain overlink. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:48, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
  • Review 1:
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Long article, well referenced, in time, hook OK. Pedants might grumble about "church" and "chapel" being used as synonyms, but I see no problem in the context in which they are used here. I perceive no conflict of interest or promotional concerns. Incidentally the first time the word "church" is used in the article, the link takes it to a disambig page. Does the word need to be linked, anyway? --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks, fair point; I've removed the overlinking. Prioryman (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Review 2:
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg The article is referenced and not promotional. Hook is ok, but IMO the renaming to Queen's Chapel will make a more interesting hook. --Redtigerxyz Talk 08:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I am fine with either hook; thanks for the review. I Prioryman (talk) 09:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)