Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kings Plaza"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius (cmt) |
imported>97198 (re) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Epicgenius}} Another very well researched NYC article! Recent GA, long enough, well referenced, and no obvious close paraphrasing from Earwig or a spot-check of non-text sources. For the first hook, the URL for the reference supporting the power system ([http://fultonhistory.com/highlighter/highlight-for-xml?altUrl=http%3A%2F%2Ffultonhistory.com%2FNewspapers%252023%2FBrooklyn%2520NY%2520New%2520York%2520%26%2520Brooklyn%2520Daily%2FBrooklyn%2520NY%2520New%2520York%2520%26%2520Brooklyn%2520Daily%25201970%2FBrooklyn%2520NY%2520New%2520York%2520%26%2520Brooklyn%2520Daily%25201970%2520-%25202566.pdf]) appears to be dead; can you replace it? For the second hook, I think it would be more accurate to say "unaccompanied teenagers" for accuracy as reflected in the article and the source. Also waiting on a QPQ. [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 09:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Epicgenius}} Another very well researched NYC article! Recent GA, long enough, well referenced, and no obvious close paraphrasing from Earwig or a spot-check of non-text sources. For the first hook, the URL for the reference supporting the power system ([http://fultonhistory.com/highlighter/highlight-for-xml?altUrl=http%3A%2F%2Ffultonhistory.com%2FNewspapers%252023%2FBrooklyn%2520NY%2520New%2520York%2520%26%2520Brooklyn%2520Daily%2FBrooklyn%2520NY%2520New%2520York%2520%26%2520Brooklyn%2520Daily%25201970%2FBrooklyn%2520NY%2520New%2520York%2520%26%2520Brooklyn%2520Daily%25201970%2520-%25202566.pdf]) appears to be dead; can you replace it? For the second hook, I think it would be more accurate to say "unaccompanied teenagers" for accuracy as reflected in the article and the source. Also waiting on a QPQ. [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 09:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
::*{{re|97198}} Thanks for the review. For the first hook I revised the sources to use the source PDF directly, rather than a viewer, which was causing the dead links. For the second hook I added unaccompanied teenagers. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 14:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC) | ::*{{re|97198}} Thanks for the review. For the first hook I revised the sources to use the source PDF directly, rather than a viewer, which was causing the dead links. For the second hook I added unaccompanied teenagers. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 14:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::*[https://fultonhistory.com/Newspapers%2023/Brooklyn%20NY%20New%20York%20&%20Brooklyn%20Daily/Brooklyn%20NY%20New%20York%20&%20Brooklyn%20Daily%201970/Brooklyn%20NY%20New%20York%20&%20Brooklyn%20Daily%201970%20-%202566.pdf This link] (reference 13 in the article, and linked above) is still dead for me. [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 14:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 14:51, 28 September 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
Kings Plaza
- ... that New York City's Kings Plaza shopping mall was built with a marina for visitors, as well as its own power system? Source: Brooklyn Daily 1, Brooklyn Daily 2
- ALT1:... that unaccompanied teenagers were temporarily banned from New York City's Kings Plaza shopping mall in 2013? Source: CBS news
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk) and Tdorante10 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 03:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC).
Template:Ping Another very well researched NYC article! Recent GA, long enough, well referenced, and no obvious close paraphrasing from Earwig or a spot-check of non-text sources. For the first hook, the URL for the reference supporting the power system ([1]) appears to be dead; can you replace it? For the second hook, I think it would be more accurate to say "unaccompanied teenagers" for accuracy as reflected in the article and the source. Also waiting on a QPQ. 97198 (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re Thanks for the review. For the first hook I revised the sources to use the source PDF directly, rather than a viewer, which was causing the dead links. For the second hook I added unaccompanied teenagers. epicgenius (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)