Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kumbharia Jain Temples"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pratyk321 |
imported>Amkgp (promoted ALT3 with picture and moved to prep 1) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from August 2020]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 14:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Kumbharia Jain Temples}} | {{DYK header|Kumbharia Jain Temples}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Kumbharia Jain Temples|Kumbharia Jain temples}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Kumbharia Jain Temples|Kumbharia Jain temples}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:* :<s>... that '''[[Kumbharia Jain temples]]''' are important to Maru Gujara architecture?</s> <small>Source: https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/161713/14/09_chapter%203.pdf Source : https://books.google.co.in/books?id=P7EHTBl_pyQC&pg=PA171 Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=61fSwBF4bbYC&pg=PR15</small> | :* :<s>... that '''[[Kumbharia Jain temples]]''' are important to Maru Gujara architecture?</s> <small>Source: https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/161713/14/09_chapter%203.pdf Source : https://books.google.co.in/books?id=P7EHTBl_pyQC&pg=PA171 Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=61fSwBF4bbYC&pg=PR15</small> | ||
::* '''ALT1''':<s>... that '''[[Kumbharia Jain temples]]''' along with [[Dilwara Temples]], [[Girnar Jain temples]] and [[Taranga Jain temple]] are considered excellent example of Chaulukyan architecture?</s> <small> Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=nSDACkmA_ukC&pg=PA67 Source: https://www.soas.ac.uk/south-asia-institute/annualreview/file45211.pdf</small> | ::* '''ALT1''':<s>... that '''[[Kumbharia Jain temples]]''' along with [[Dilwara Temples]], [[Girnar Jain temples]] and [[Taranga Jain temple]] are considered excellent example of Chaulukyan architecture?</s> <small> Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=nSDACkmA_ukC&pg=PA67 Source: https://www.soas.ac.uk/south-asia-institute/annualreview/file45211.pdf</small> | ||
Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Pratyk321|Pratyk321]] ([[User talk:Pratyk321|talk]]). Self-nominated at 08:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Pratyk321|Pratyk321]] ([[User talk:Pratyk321|talk]]). Self-nominated at 08:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:{{re|Pratyk321}} Malformed nomination: no hook provided Please fix. [[User:SD0001|SD0001]] ([[User talk:SD0001|talk]]) 12:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC) | :{{re|Pratyk321}} Malformed nomination: no hook provided Please fix. [[User:SD0001|SD0001]] ([[User talk:SD0001|talk]]) 12:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
− | :: {{re|SD0001}}, Thanks for writing back. I have used other nomination pages to fix hooks. Kindly, review suggest if I should update these further. | + | :: {{re|SD0001}}, Thanks for writing back. I have used other nomination pages to fix hooks. Kindly, review suggest if I should update these further. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pratyk321|Pratyk321]] ([[User talk:Pratyk321#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pratyk321|contribs]]) 18:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)</small> |
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article needs a copyedit for English grammar. One sentence after another shows unfamiliarity with spelling and sentence structure, e.g. {{tq|Kumbariya Jain temple are famous for there ellaborate architecture. The Jain temples, Kumbhariya along with Dilwara temples, Girnar Jain temples and Taranga Jain temple are considered excellent example of Chaulukyan architecture. Mahavira, Shantinatha and Parshvanatha temple are the one of the most renowned temple in India.}} You could apply for help at [[WP:GOCE]]. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC) | ::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article needs a copyedit for English grammar. One sentence after another shows unfamiliarity with spelling and sentence structure, e.g. {{tq|Kumbariya Jain temple are famous for there ellaborate architecture. The Jain temples, Kumbhariya along with Dilwara temples, Girnar Jain temples and Taranga Jain temple are considered excellent example of Chaulukyan architecture. Mahavira, Shantinatha and Parshvanatha temple are the one of the most renowned temple in India.}} You could apply for help at [[WP:GOCE]]. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
Line 48: | Line 40: | ||
::I concur with the comments below. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 13:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC) | ::I concur with the comments below. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 13:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] ALT 3 reviewed: interesting, sourced in article - sources all seem primary, but it is a tourism/state matter so these seem acceptable. Article meets requirements. No comment on the image, but would be a good change up from portraits/diagrams if needed. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 12:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC) | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] ALT 3 reviewed: interesting, sourced in article - sources all seem primary, but it is a tourism/state matter so these seem acceptable. Article meets requirements. No comment on the image, but would be a good change up from portraits/diagrams if needed. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 12:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
− | :::*{{ping|Yoninah}}, {{ping|evrik}} and {{ping|Kingsif}} Thanks for reviewing the article. - [[User:Pratyk321|Pratyk321]] ([[User talk:Pratyk321|talk]]) | + | :::*{{ping|Yoninah}}, {{ping|evrik}} and {{ping|Kingsif}} Thanks for reviewing the article. - [[User:Pratyk321|Pratyk321]] ([[User talk:Pratyk321|talk]])</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 14:24, 15 September 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Kumbharia Jain Temples
- :
... that Kumbharia Jain temples are important to Maru Gujara architecture?Source: https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/161713/14/09_chapter%203.pdf Source : https://books.google.co.in/books?id=P7EHTBl_pyQC&pg=PA171 Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=61fSwBF4bbYC&pg=PR15
- ALT1:
... that Kumbharia Jain temples along with Dilwara Temples, Girnar Jain temples and Taranga Jain temple are considered excellent example of Chaulukyan architecture?Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=nSDACkmA_ukC&pg=PA67 Source: https://www.soas.ac.uk/south-asia-institute/annualreview/file45211.pdf - 'ALT2:
... that Kumbharia Jain temples were established in 1062 CE?Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=2fomDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA56#v=onepage&q=Kumbharia&f=false
- ALT1:
- :
Created/expanded by Pratyk321 (talk). Self-nominated at 08:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC).
- Template:Re Malformed nomination: no hook provided Please fix. SD0001 (talk) 12:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Re, Thanks for writing back. I have used other nomination pages to fix hooks. Kindly, review suggest if I should update these further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pratyk321 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The article needs a copyedit for English grammar. One sentence after another shows unfamiliarity with spelling and sentence structure, e.g. Template:Tq You could apply for help at WP:GOCE. Yoninah (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Yoninah (talk), Thanks for pointing this out. I have tried to fixed the issue. Could you please review again. - Pratyk321 (talk • contribs)
- Template:Ping you still have subject-verb confusion throughout the article. Here is an example, including a spelling mistake: Template:Tq Someone needs to go over the whole article. Yoninah (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I have tried to improved the quality of article. I also received some help from WP:GOCE. Thanks and regards - Pratyk321 (talk • contribs)
- Template:Ping When WP:GOCE works on an article they leave a template message on the talk page. I'm not sure who your GOCE is, but it's still not English. See: Template:Tq I'm not going to keep picking out examples of bad grammar. Please get this edited properly. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Uh,hello again. Anoher DYK that needs a copyedit. Hmm, here we go again. Can I Log In (talk) 01:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:OdArticle has been copyedited. So the article has <600 words, which does not meet the DYK length requirement of 1,500 words of prose. Can I Log In (talk) 22:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping thanks for your work! The length requirement is 1500 characters, not words. This article has more than 3,900 characters, so it's eligible. I'll review it tomorrow. BTW, what is a "porched gateway"? Do you mean an "arched gateway"? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Let's just assume arched. And uh
wow I'm so good at reading... Can I Log In (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your work, Template:U. I have done further editing to fix the English grammar. I've also copyedited the section that Template:U added to Māru-Gurjara architecture.
- Here is a full review: New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen in online sources. Images are freely licensed. No QPQ needed for nominator with less than 5 DYK credits.
- None of the hooks, however, are interesting enough to click on and read more; they are merely statements of fact. I've struck them all. I'm surprised that you are not building a hook around that fantastic image in the article. Such as:
- Let's just assume arched. And uh
- ALT3: ... that only five Jain temples (one pictured) remain in the Kumbhariya district of Gujarat out of hundreds that were destroyed by volcanic activity? Source: https://www.gujarattourism.com/destination/details/6/79 Source : https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Lr4IAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA438 Source: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=xScXAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA141
- ALT4:
... that the Kumbharia Jain temples (one pictured), built between the 11th and 13th centuries, are noted for their elaborate architecture?Source: https://www.soas.ac.uk/south-asia-institute/annualreview/file45211.pdf Source : https://books.google.co.in/books?id=61fSwBF4bbYC&pg=PR15 Yoninah (talk) 01:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping, Thanks for right back. I have added source to hooks you added. - Pratyk321 (talk)
- Template:Ping there is no reason to add sources to this template. The main thing is that they are present as inline cites in the article. Are they? I thought so. Yoninah (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping, Could you please confirm further steps I need to make?
- Template:Ping I can see that ALT3 is verified in the article but the source for the second part of ALT4, that they Template:Tq, is not clear. Are you happy with ALT3? Yoninah (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- *Template:Ping looks good. Could we include "that the Kumbharia Jain temples (one pictured), built between the 11th and 13th centuries" part of ALT4 with ALT3?
- Template:Ping Why? We're not looking to say everything in the hook, just write something interesting that readers will click on to find out more. Anyway, there's the image to look at too. Yoninah (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Od As I said, ALT3 is better sourced. Since I wrote the hook, requesting a reviewer for ALT3. Pinging Template:U and Template:U for help here. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
ALT 3 reviewed: interesting, sourced in article - sources all seem primary, but it is a tourism/state matter so these seem acceptable. Article meets requirements. No comment on the image, but would be a good change up from portraits/diagrams if needed. Kingsif (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping, Template:Ping and Template:Ping Thanks for reviewing the article. - Pratyk321 (talk)