Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lees Creek (Lackawanna River)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jakec
(not so fast)
imported>Northamerica1000
(re)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
::A problem is that the QPQ review at [[Template:Did you know nominations/1630 Crete earthquake]] is being used for this nomination ''and'' for the [[Template:Did you know nominations/Eddy Creek (Lackawanna River)]] (which was approved by another user) and [[Template:Did you know nominations/Powderly Creek]] nominations. Per [[WP:WIADYK]], #5, "For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination." The 1630 Crete earthquake review cannot be used for multiple nominations. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 04:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 
::A problem is that the QPQ review at [[Template:Did you know nominations/1630 Crete earthquake]] is being used for this nomination ''and'' for the [[Template:Did you know nominations/Eddy Creek (Lackawanna River)]] (which was approved by another user) and [[Template:Did you know nominations/Powderly Creek]] nominations. Per [[WP:WIADYK]], #5, "For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination." The 1630 Crete earthquake review cannot be used for multiple nominations. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 04:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Whoa, hold it. The 1630 Crete Earthquake is a triple nomination! The nominator added two more bolded links and I reviewed them. Even if that weren't the case, you could just, you know, have me do another QPQ instead of rejecting it. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 09:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Whoa, hold it. The 1630 Crete Earthquake is a triple nomination! The nominator added two more bolded links and I reviewed them. Even if that weren't the case, you could just, you know, have me do another QPQ instead of rejecting it. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 09:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 +
::::Sorry for the potential confusion. However, at the 1630 Crete Earthquake nomination, you did not really provide a review for [[Kythira Strait]]. Rather, you proposed a standalone hook. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 10:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:22, 7 June 2015

Lees Creek (Lackawanna River)

  • ... that part of the channel Lees Creek cuts through coal waste, cinders, and railroad ballast?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 17:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Starting with approved matters: new and long enough. Per the revision history, the page was actually created on 29 May 2015‎, but the nomination is still within seven days of the publishing to main namespace (the entry is listed on the DYK nominations page under Articles created/expanded on June 1). All non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, Checks for copyvio reveals no problems, content of the hook is backed by an inline citation to a reliable source in the article (here, p. 323).
A problem is that the QPQ review at Template:Did you know nominations/1630 Crete earthquake is being used for this nomination and for the Template:Did you know nominations/Eddy Creek (Lackawanna River) (which was approved by another user) and Template:Did you know nominations/Powderly Creek nominations. Per WP:WIADYK, #5, "For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination." The 1630 Crete earthquake review cannot be used for multiple nominations. North America1000 04:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Whoa, hold it. The 1630 Crete Earthquake is a triple nomination! The nominator added two more bolded links and I reviewed them. Even if that weren't the case, you could just, you know, have me do another QPQ instead of rejecting it. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 09:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the potential confusion. However, at the 1630 Crete Earthquake nomination, you did not really provide a review for Kythira Strait. Rather, you proposed a standalone hook. North America1000 10:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)