Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lockhart v. United States (2005)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Wugapodes
(Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Lockhart v. United States (2005) | article2 = | status = new | hook = ... that the [...')
 
imported>Notecardforfree
(Approving nomination)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article was created on March 25, it is over 1,500 characters, it is neutral, all claims are sourced appropriately, and there are no problems with copyvio (Earwig's detector gives a bunch of false positives for quoted language and other terms of art ... these false positives are common in articles about legal cases). The hook is under 200 characters, properly cited, and interesting. QPQ is satisfied and there are no images associated with this nomination. Many thanks for your hard work with this article and for your efforts to expand coverage of SCOTUS cases. This is an excellent addition to the encyclopedia and I look forward to seeing it on the main page! Best, -- [[User:Notecardforfree|Notecardforfree]] ([[User talk:Notecardforfree|talk]]) 18:45, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:46, 2 April 2016

Lockhart v. United States (2005)

Created by Wugapodes (talk). Self-nominated at 00:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg This article was created on March 25, it is over 1,500 characters, it is neutral, all claims are sourced appropriately, and there are no problems with copyvio (Earwig's detector gives a bunch of false positives for quoted language and other terms of art ... these false positives are common in articles about legal cases). The hook is under 200 characters, properly cited, and interesting. QPQ is satisfied and there are no images associated with this nomination. Many thanks for your hard work with this article and for your efforts to expand coverage of SCOTUS cases. This is an excellent addition to the encyclopedia and I look forward to seeing it on the main page! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:45, 2 April 2016 (UTC)