Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/MFi Program"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maury Markowitz |
imported>BlueMoonset (needs a full review) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:*Why is the unofficial apple weblog (TUAW) a [[WP:RS]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 02:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC) | :*Why is the unofficial apple weblog (TUAW) a [[WP:RS]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 02:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::It's a ''widely'' quoted news source, USEBYOTHERS. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 18:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC) | :::It's a ''widely'' quoted news source, USEBYOTHERS. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 18:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Needs a full review, including on sourcing and hook issues mentioned above. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 22:57, 2 July 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
MFi Program
- ... that in order to display Apple Inc.'s Made for iPod badge, suppliers must agree to be bound to Apple's Supplier Responsibility Code?
- Comment: I'd like comments on sourcing for the hook, and whether or not a "TUAW claims..." needs to be added? Alternate hooks are easy and still punchy, if need be.
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self nominated at 13:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC).
Source does not support the hook. The source speculates on the possibility of such a requirement.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Right, so if we add the text as in the comment, is it then good to go? (continued below)
- The hook would still not be accurate. You need to propose and ALT hook.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's what the comment did, propose an alternate hook. IE, "...according to a report in TUAW, in in order to join Apple Inc.'s MFi Program, suppliers must agree to be bound to Apple's Supplier Responsibility Code?"
- The hook would still not be accurate. You need to propose and ALT hook.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Right, so if we add the text as in the comment, is it then good to go? (continued below)
- Why is the unofficial apple weblog (TUAW) a WP:RS.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's a widely quoted news source, USEBYOTHERS. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Needs a full review, including on sourcing and hook issues mentioned above. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)