Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Macombs Dam Bridge"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John M Wolfson
(Will do, hope you feel better)
imported>John M Wolfson
(ALT0 is good to go, IMO.)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:::{{u|John M Wolfson}}, thanks for talking up the review. Can you look at the first two hooks? I have just gotten out of a surgery and will not be able to look for other hooks for a couple days. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 16:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 
:::{{u|John M Wolfson}}, thanks for talking up the review. Can you look at the first two hooks? I have just gotten out of a surgery and will not be able to look for other hooks for a couple days. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 16:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 
::::Will do, hope you feel better! – [[User:John M Wolfson|John M Wolfson]] ([[User talk:John M Wolfson|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John M Wolfson|contribs]]) 16:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 
::::Will do, hope you feel better! – [[User:John M Wolfson|John M Wolfson]] ([[User talk:John M Wolfson|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John M Wolfson|contribs]]) 16:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 +
*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The article seems neutral enough and Earwig's tool does not return any copyvios. {{tick}} ALT0 is directly stated in the article and verified by the source given. {{tick}} (I'm not so sure that ALT1 is expressly stated in the body of the article; ALT0 is better in my opinion, anyway.) QPQ appears adequate.{{tick}} Overall, I see no problems with ALT0, and can approve them if you don't feel like making more. – [[User:John M Wolfson|John M Wolfson]] ([[User talk:John M Wolfson|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John M Wolfson|contribs]]) 06:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 +
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 06:54, 10 January 2020

Macombs Dam Bridge

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 20:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC).

  • I will be reviewing this. At first glance this already seems more than long enough ☑Y and passes the 5x expansion mark. ☑Y I'll look at the rest later, and evaluate hooks when you have them. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 21:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Template:U, thanks for talking up the review. Can you look at the first two hooks? I have just gotten out of a surgery and will not be able to look for other hooks for a couple days. epicgenius (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Will do, hope you feel better! – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 16:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg The article seems neutral enough and Earwig's tool does not return any copyvios. ☑Y ALT0 is directly stated in the article and verified by the source given. ☑Y (I'm not so sure that ALT1 is expressly stated in the body of the article; ALT0 is better in my opinion, anyway.) QPQ appears adequate.☑Y Overall, I see no problems with ALT0, and can approve them if you don't feel like making more. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 06:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)