Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Maouri people"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cmprince
(+QPQ)
imported>Prioryman
(Good to go)
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
:* Sources are all offline, so AGF. Article is well-written and interesting; I've made a few minor copyedits but nothing particularly earth-shaking. Age and length requirements are met. QPQ review hasn't been carried out yet, so I'll hold off final endorsement of this nomination until it's done - but it should be just a formality at that point. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 
:* Sources are all offline, so AGF. Article is well-written and interesting; I've made a few minor copyedits but nothing particularly earth-shaking. Age and length requirements are met. QPQ review hasn't been carried out yet, so I'll hold off final endorsement of this nomination until it's done - but it should be just a formality at that point. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 +
:* [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Thanks for doing the review - that concludes this one! Good to go now. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 07:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:14, 12 July 2012

Maouri people

Created/expanded by Cmprince (talk). Self nom at 11:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Sources are all offline, so AGF. Article is well-written and interesting; I've made a few minor copyedits but nothing particularly earth-shaking. Age and length requirements are met. QPQ review hasn't been carried out yet, so I'll hold off final endorsement of this nomination until it's done - but it should be just a formality at that point. Prioryman (talk) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Thanks for doing the review - that concludes this one! Good to go now. Prioryman (talk) 07:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)