Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Maouri people"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cmprince (+QPQ) |
imported>Prioryman (Good to go) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:* Sources are all offline, so AGF. Article is well-written and interesting; I've made a few minor copyedits but nothing particularly earth-shaking. Age and length requirements are met. QPQ review hasn't been carried out yet, so I'll hold off final endorsement of this nomination until it's done - but it should be just a formality at that point. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC) | :* Sources are all offline, so AGF. Article is well-written and interesting; I've made a few minor copyedits but nothing particularly earth-shaking. Age and length requirements are met. QPQ review hasn't been carried out yet, so I'll hold off final endorsement of this nomination until it's done - but it should be just a formality at that point. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | :* [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Thanks for doing the review - that concludes this one! Good to go now. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 07:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 07:14, 12 July 2012
Maouri people
- ... that the Maouri people resisted an attack by the French Voulet-Chanoine Mission at the Battle of Lougou?
- Reviewed: LaCrosse Footwear
Created/expanded by Cmprince (talk). Self nom at 11:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Sources are all offline, so AGF. Article is well-written and interesting; I've made a few minor copyedits but nothing particularly earth-shaking. Age and length requirements are met. QPQ review hasn't been carried out yet, so I'll hold off final endorsement of this nomination until it's done - but it should be just a formality at that point. Prioryman (talk) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the review - that concludes this one! Good to go now. Prioryman (talk) 07:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)