Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Megabat"
imported>Toreightyone (Review (1/2)) |
imported>Toreightyone (Review (2/2)) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Length: {{tick}} - 38 kb<br> | Length: {{tick}} - 38 kb<br> | ||
Copyvio Check: {{tick}} - unlikely<br> | Copyvio Check: {{tick}} - unlikely<br> | ||
| − | Neutrality: {{ | + | Neutrality: {{tick}}<br> |
| − | Grammar: {{ | + | Grammar: {{tick}} - after checking the entire article for grammar, I just realized that it was already thoroughly checked by the Good Article review, but alas, everything checks out<br> |
Sources: {{tick}} - everything is sourced<br> | Sources: {{tick}} - everything is sourced<br> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
'''Overall:'''<br> | '''Overall:'''<br> | ||
| + | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Fantastic job {{u|Enwebb}}, I can see you put an incredible amount of effort into the article. If you would like to add an image to your DYK nomination, let me know and I can adjust my review accordingly. Cheers, [[User:Toreightyone|Toreightyone]] ([[User talk:Toreightyone|talk]]) 22:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 22:08, 7 June 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Megabat
- ... that in two species of megabat, males can lactate? Source: "However, male lactation has been documented in populations of free-ranging Dayak fruit bats Dyacopterus spadecius in Malaysia (Figure 1) and the masked flying fox Pteropus capistrastus in Papua New Guinea." ([1])
- Reviewed: Hypericum olympicum
Improved to Good Article status by Enwebb (talk). Self-nominated at 02:48, 3 June 2019 (UTC).
- I don't know if I have the time to review this, but while both hooks are good, the first hook is probably the most eye-catching one and perhaps will result in the most interest. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Reviewing --Toreightyone (talk) 11:21, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Initial Review:
Article:
Newness:
- nominated four days after good article promotion
Length:
- 38 kb
Copyvio Check:
- unlikely
Neutrality: ![]()
Grammar:
- after checking the entire article for grammar, I just realized that it was already thoroughly checked by the Good Article review, but alas, everything checks out
Sources:
- everything is sourced
Hook:
Length: :
- <200 characters each
Content:
- ALT0 is very eye-catching as Naruto mentioned previously, appears in the article
Neutrality: ![]()
Source:
- appears in article; information appears in the abstract, but further details are behind a paywall
QPQ: ![]()
Overall:
Fantastic job Template:U, I can see you put an incredible amount of effort into the article. If you would like to add an image to your DYK nomination, let me know and I can adjust my review accordingly. Cheers, Toreightyone (talk) 22:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)