Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Miss Kamala"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Vensatry (resp) |
imported>Michael Barera (GTG!) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:* I moved this nomination to February 2, the start of expansion. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 07:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC) | :* I moved this nomination to February 2, the start of expansion. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 07:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | :* ''After QPQ is done'': [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] New enough (expansion began on February 2), long enough (expansion from 510 to 3,399 characters, by my admittedly unscientific count, which is good for 6.6x expansion), and free of any apparent policy issues (it is neutral, cites sourced effectively with inline citations [note that plot summaries don't require inline citations], and is free of any apparent copyright concerns). I am accepting the two Tamil sources in good faith, as I unfortunately do not speak the language. The hooks are both short enough, interesting, and properly referenced in the article with an inline citation. I think either the first hook or the alternate would work well on the main page. Everything with this article looks good to me, and I'll be happy to pass it as good to go in good faith after QPQ is taken care of. [[User:Michael Barera|Michael Barera]] ([[User talk:Michael Barera|talk]]) 16:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | + | :* <s>''After QPQ is done'':</s> [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] New enough (expansion began on February 2), long enough (expansion from 510 to 3,399 characters, by my admittedly unscientific count, which is good for 6.6x expansion), and free of any apparent policy issues (it is neutral, cites sourced effectively with inline citations [note that plot summaries don't require inline citations], and is free of any apparent copyright concerns). I am accepting the two Tamil sources in good faith, as I unfortunately do not speak the language. The hooks are both short enough, interesting, and properly referenced in the article with an inline citation. I think either the first hook or the alternate would work well on the main page. Everything with this article looks good to me, and I'll be happy to pass it as good to go in good faith after QPQ is taken care of. [[User:Michael Barera|Michael Barera]] ([[User talk:Michael Barera|talk]]) 16:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC) |
::*{{ping|Michael Barera}} Thanks for the detailed review. QPQ done now <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—[[User:Vensatry|<font color = "indigo" >'''Vensatry'''</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:Vensatry|<font color = "Indigo" >'''(ping)'''</font>]] </sub></span> 19:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | ::*{{ping|Michael Barera}} Thanks for the detailed review. QPQ done now <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—[[User:Vensatry|<font color = "indigo" >'''Vensatry'''</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:Vensatry|<font color = "Indigo" >'''(ping)'''</font>]] </sub></span> 19:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Good to go! [[User:Michael Barera|Michael Barera]] ([[User talk:Michael Barera|talk]]) 04:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 04:12, 7 February 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Miss Kamala
- ... that Miss Kamala (1936) was the first South Indian film to be directed by a woman?
- ALT1:... that Miss Kamala (1936) was the second Indian film to be directed by a woman?
- Reviewed:
To followArthur Phillips (musician)
5x expanded by Vensatry (talk). Self nominated at 19:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC).
After QPQ is done:
New enough (expansion began on February 2), long enough (expansion from 510 to 3,399 characters, by my admittedly unscientific count, which is good for 6.6x expansion), and free of any apparent policy issues (it is neutral, cites sourced effectively with inline citations [note that plot summaries don't require inline citations], and is free of any apparent copyright concerns). I am accepting the two Tamil sources in good faith, as I unfortunately do not speak the language. The hooks are both short enough, interesting, and properly referenced in the article with an inline citation. I think either the first hook or the alternate would work well on the main page. Everything with this article looks good to me, and I'll be happy to pass it as good to go in good faith after QPQ is taken care of. Michael Barera (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks for the detailed review. QPQ done now —Vensatry (ping) 19:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Good to go! Michael Barera (talk) 04:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)