Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Necromys"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kevmin
imported>Kevmin
Line 31: Line 31:
 
::*''Necromys urichi'' expansion new enough and long enough.  Article referenced, with the hook fact clear from several references. ''Necromys'' refers to ''N. urichi'' as the "Northern Bolo mouse", while the ''N. urichi'' article makes no mention of that name at all, and is missing several of the other binomial synonyms from Mammals of South America.  What of the three names  "Northern bolo mouse" "Northern grass mouse" or ''Necromys urichi'' is most commonly found in the literature?--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 11:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 
::*''Necromys urichi'' expansion new enough and long enough.  Article referenced, with the hook fact clear from several references. ''Necromys'' refers to ''N. urichi'' as the "Northern Bolo mouse", while the ''N. urichi'' article makes no mention of that name at all, and is missing several of the other binomial synonyms from Mammals of South America.  What of the three names  "Northern bolo mouse" "Northern grass mouse" or ''Necromys urichi'' is most commonly found in the literature?--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 11:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 
::*''Necromys amoenus'' expansion new enough and long enough.  The article is cited and the sources verify the hook.  No policy issues identified with the article.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 15:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 
::*''Necromys amoenus'' expansion new enough and long enough.  The article is cited and the sources verify the hook.  No policy issues identified with the article.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 15:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Articles ''[[Necromys]]'' [[Hairy-tailed bolo mouse]] [[Paraguayan bolo mouse]] [[Dark bolo mouse]] are all expanded enough and nominated in the nomination window.  Articles are referenced and the hook is supported by the taxonomy presented in multiple of the sources.  Excluding ''[[Necromys]]'', the articles should probably be at the binomials as they all have several vernacular names. No policy issues identified with the articles at this time.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 01:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:17, 18 June 2016

Necromys, Hairy-tailed bolo mouse, Paraguayan bolo mouse, Dark bolo mouse, Spotted bolo mouse, Pleasant bolo mouse

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC).

  • starting review --Kevmin § 16:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Necromys urichi expansion new enough and long enough. Article referenced, with the hook fact clear from several references. Necromys refers to N. urichi as the "Northern Bolo mouse", while the N. urichi article makes no mention of that name at all, and is missing several of the other binomial synonyms from Mammals of South America. What of the three names "Northern bolo mouse" "Northern grass mouse" or Necromys urichi is most commonly found in the literature?--Kevmin § 11:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Necromys amoenus expansion new enough and long enough. The article is cited and the sources verify the hook. No policy issues identified with the article.--Kevmin § 15:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svgArticles Necromys Hairy-tailed bolo mouse Paraguayan bolo mouse Dark bolo mouse are all expanded enough and nominated in the nomination window. Articles are referenced and the hook is supported by the taxonomy presented in multiple of the sources. Excluding Necromys, the articles should probably be at the binomials as they all have several vernacular names. No policy issues identified with the articles at this time.--Kevmin § 01:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)