Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Neil McLaughlin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kosack (+ QPQ review) |
imported>Rhododendrites (gtg, question) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> | --> | ||
* ... that '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' started boxing "by mistake" after an argument with his gymnastics coach? <small>Source: [https://www.derryjournal.com/sport/other-sport/derry-olympian-neil-passes-on-1-5773990 Derry Journal]</small> | * ... that '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' started boxing "by mistake" after an argument with his gymnastics coach? <small>Source: [https://www.derryjournal.com/sport/other-sport/derry-olympian-neil-passes-on-1-5773990 Derry Journal]</small> | ||
| − | ** '''ALT1''':... that [[Boxing|boxer]] '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' was shot at by soldiers after throwing stones at vehicles during [[Bloody Sunday (1972)|Bloody Sunday]]? <small>Source: [https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/olympic-boxer-ducked-bullets-in-bogside-26093289.html Irish Independent]</small> | + | ** <s>'''ALT1''':... that [[Boxing|boxer]] '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' was shot at by soldiers after throwing stones at vehicles during [[Bloody Sunday (1972)|Bloody Sunday]]? <small>Source: [https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/olympic-boxer-ducked-bullets-in-bogside-26093289.html Irish Independent]</small></s> |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bambang Soegeng|Bambang Soegeng]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bambang Soegeng|Bambang Soegeng]] | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|plagiarismfree = y<!---Is the article free of material copied from other sources?---> | |plagiarismfree = y<!---Is the article free of material copied from other sources?---> | ||
|policyother = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none---> | |policyother = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none---> | ||
| − | |hookcited = First hook is sourced. Second hook's source looks to be reporting on what McLaughlin said rather than the source itself saying it happened. Obviously no big deal if we go with the first one, and trivial to correct if the second is preferred. | + | |hookcited = y <s>First hook is sourced. Second hook's source looks to be reporting on what McLaughlin said rather than the source itself saying it happened. Obviously no big deal if we go with the first one, and trivial to correct if the second is preferred.</s> |
|hookinterest = y<!---Is the hook reasonably interesting?---> | |hookinterest = y<!---Is the hook reasonably interesting?---> | ||
|hookother = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none---> | |hookother = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none---> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
|qpq = pending<!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"---> | |qpq = pending<!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"---> | ||
|status = ?<!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look---> | |status = ?<!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look---> | ||
| − | |comments = Presuming a mild preference for the first hook (since it's first). I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other. They're both "hooky" and the second can easily be fixed. | + | |comments = Presuming a mild preference for the first hook (since it's first). I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other. They're both "hooky" and the second can easily be fixed. <br/> |
|sign = — <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 17:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)<!---Your signature. Generally, can be left as is---> | |sign = — <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 17:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)<!---Your signature. Generally, can be left as is---> | ||
}} | }} | ||
::{{re|Rhododendrites}} Thanks for the review, I've added my QPQ in for this now. Happy to stick with the first hook. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC) | ::{{re|Rhododendrites}} Thanks for the review, I've added my QPQ in for this now. Happy to stick with the first hook. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] good to go with the first hook — <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Aside: I never know what to do with the checklist once problems are addressed, since you can't keep a comment and change to "y" (and deleting the comment removes context). Is this way of just moving on from the checklist after it's been responded to ok? — <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 20:01, 10 December 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Neil McLaughlin
- ... that Neil McLaughlin started boxing "by mistake" after an argument with his gymnastics coach? Source: Derry Journal
ALT1:... that boxer Neil McLaughlin was shot at by soldiers after throwing stones at vehicles during Bloody Sunday? Source: Irish Independent
- Reviewed: Bambang Soegeng
5x expanded by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 20:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC).
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Template:Re Thanks for the review, I've added my QPQ in for this now. Happy to stick with the first hook. Kosack (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
good to go with the first hook — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)- Aside: I never know what to do with the checklist once problems are addressed, since you can't keep a comment and change to "y" (and deleting the comment removes context). Is this way of just moving on from the checklist after it's been responded to ok? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re Thanks for the review, I've added my QPQ in for this now. Happy to stick with the first hook. Kosack (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)