Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Brend"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
imported>Jonesey95
m (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from April 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
 
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from April 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Nicholas Brend]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Brend|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Nicholas Brend|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
+
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Nicholas Brend]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Brend|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Nicholas Brend|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}}
  
 
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 12:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC).<br />
 
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 12:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC).<br />

Latest revision as of 08:15, 12 October 2018

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Nicholas Brend's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 12:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC).

Nicholas Brend

Created by NinaGreen (talk). Self nominated at 00:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg The article was long enough and just barely new enough (created 16 April, nominated 21 April), when nominated. It is cited prolifically, although with mostly offline sources. The hook is short enough and cited in the article, although in an offline source. I wikified Matthew Brend in the hook. The article for Matthew Brend had its DYK promoted but it's currently in Prep area 2 — if it's moved back, they could run together. QPQ is complete. This DYK nomination is good to go. - tucoxn\talk 04:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)