Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Odontomachus spinifer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jon Kolbert (Approved, note about links) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 4) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Odontomachus spinifer==== | ====Odontomachus spinifer==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Odontomachus spinifer SMNSDO2215 profile.jpg|caption=worker in amber showing spine|width=120x133}} | {{main page image|image=Odontomachus spinifer SMNSDO2215 profile.jpg|caption=worker in amber showing spine|width=120x133}} | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the Dominican amber ant '''''[[Odontomachus spinifer]]''''' ''(pictured)'' was named for its very large spine? <small>Source: "De Andrade, 1994 etymology section".</small> | * ... that the Dominican amber ant '''''[[Odontomachus spinifer]]''''' ''(pictured)'' was named for its very large spine? <small>Source: "De Andrade, 1994 etymology section".</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Balanophyllia elegans|Balanophyllia elegans]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Balanophyllia elegans|Balanophyllia elegans]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Kevmin|Kevmin]] ([[User talk:Kevmin|talk]]). Self-nominated at 22:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Kevmin|Kevmin]] ([[User talk:Kevmin|talk]]). Self-nominated at 22:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Looks good. I've added a DOI to the reference so readers can find the resource more easily. Interesting fact! [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 23:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Looks good. I've added a DOI to the reference so readers can find the resource more easily. Interesting fact! [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 23:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
| Line 40: | Line 33: | ||
|comments = Upon further review, the description section could use some wikification and copyediting with linking to other relative articles, "then" is used in place when "than" should be. I would also change the first reference to specify the exact pages of relevance to the species. | |comments = Upon further review, the description section could use some wikification and copyediting with linking to other relative articles, "then" is used in place when "than" should be. I would also change the first reference to specify the exact pages of relevance to the species. | ||
|sign = [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 23:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC) | |sign = [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 23:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ||
::*Not a fan of the review template thing, but whatever. What specifically do you feel needs wikification? I am not and have never claimed to be great at copy-editing, and it is NOT part of the reqirements for nomination or passing of a hook. The reference has been updated.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 01:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC) | ::*Not a fan of the review template thing, but whatever. What specifically do you feel needs wikification? I am not and have never claimed to be great at copy-editing, and it is NOT part of the reqirements for nomination or passing of a hook. The reference has been updated.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 01:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}}}} | + | {{-}}}} |
| − | :::*{{re|Kevmin}} It would be useful if the description section included relative links to terms used such as "[[mesonotum]]" and "[[propodeum]]" but you are right, it's not specifically a requirement for DYK. Feel free to add those if you wish, other than that this DYK is [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] good to go. [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 16:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC) | + | :::*{{re|Kevmin}} It would be useful if the description section included relative links to terms used such as "[[mesonotum]]" and "[[propodeum]]" but you are right, it's not specifically a requirement for DYK. Feel free to add those if you wish, other than that this DYK is [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] good to go. [[User:Jon Kolbert|Jon Kolbert]] ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|talk]]) 16:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 05:38, 16 October 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Odontomachus spinifer
- ... that the Dominican amber ant Odontomachus spinifer (pictured) was named for its very large spine? Source: "De Andrade, 1994 etymology section".
- Reviewed: Balanophyllia elegans
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 22:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC).
Looks good. I've added a DOI to the reference so readers can find the resource more easily. Interesting fact! Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Template:Ping you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 22:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Template:Re It would be useful if the description section included relative links to terms used such as "mesonotum" and "propodeum" but you are right, it's not specifically a requirement for DYK. Feel free to add those if you wish, other than that this DYK is
good to go. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Re It would be useful if the description section included relative links to terms used such as "mesonotum" and "propodeum" but you are right, it's not specifically a requirement for DYK. Feel free to add those if you wish, other than that this DYK is
