Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Mosaic"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dumelow
(review)
imported>JennyOz
(minor typo)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that the second test in the '''[[Operation Mosaic]]''' series ''(pictured)'' was of the largest nuclear device ever detonated in Australia?  <small>Source: "Mosaic G2, also tower mounted was exploded on Alpha Island at 1014 WAST on 19 June 1956. It produced a yield of 60 kt, making it the largest device exploded by the UK in Australia." ([https://archive.industry.gov.au/resource/Documents/radioactive_waste/RoyalCommissioninToBritishNucleartestsinAustraliaVol%201.pdf The Report of the Royal Commission into British Nuclear Tests in Australia, Volume 1], p. 233)</small>
+
* ... that the second test in the '''[[Operation Mosaic]]''' series ''(pictured)'' was the largest nuclear device ever detonated in Australia?  <small>Source: "Mosaic G2, also tower mounted was exploded on Alpha Island at 1014 WAST on 19 June 1956. It produced a yield of 60 kt, making it the largest device exploded by the UK in Australia." ([https://archive.industry.gov.au/resource/Documents/radioactive_waste/RoyalCommissioninToBritishNucleartestsinAustraliaVol%201.pdf The Report of the Royal Commission into British Nuclear Tests in Australia, Volume 1], p. 233)</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Paper car wheel]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Paper car wheel]]
 
:* ''Comment'': No country has ever exploded atomic bombs in Australia except the UK
 
:* ''Comment'': No country has ever exploded atomic bombs in Australia except the UK

Revision as of 21:49, 12 August 2018

Operation Mosaic

Mosaic G2 nuclear test
Mosaic G2 nuclear test

5x expanded by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Hi Hawkeye7, review follows: Article expanded 5+ times over period since 3 August; article is well written and cited inline throughout to impeccable sources; many sources are offline but a spot check revealed no issues with copyright violations; hook is interesting and cited in the article; citation for hook checks out to a reliable and accessible source; image is correctly licensed and confirmed public domain; image is very good even at small scale; QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to go to me - Dumelow (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)