Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ostreopsis"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(adding a note that this was originally part of a nomination made on August 6, well within the seven-day requirement)
imported>John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)
(review)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that a '''[[Ostreopsis|marine species of dinoflagellate]]''' poisoned 209 Italian beachgoers in 2005?
+
* <s>... that a '''[[Ostreopsis|marine species of dinoflagellate]]''' poisoned 209 Italian beachgoers in 2005?</s>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nicola De Giosa|Nicola De Giosa]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nicola De Giosa|Nicola De Giosa]]
 
:* ''Comment'': This is a two article QPQ, used also for the [[Template:Did you know nominations/Palythoa toxica|Palythoa toxica nomination]], from which this nomination has been split. The original nomination was made on 6 August, well within the seven-day requirement for this article, which was created on 4 August.
 
:* ''Comment'': This is a two article QPQ, used also for the [[Template:Did you know nominations/Palythoa toxica|Palythoa toxica nomination]], from which this nomination has been split. The original nomination was made on 6 August, well within the seven-day requirement for this article, which was created on 4 August.
Line 19: Line 19:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New and long enough, within policy, Earwig detects no copyvios, QPQ done.  The hook doesn't reflect the article; the cited study implicated ''Ostreopsis'' in the adverse health effects, but not strongly enough for the way the hook is currently worded.  A hook that more closely follows the wording of the article/source would be fine.  [[User:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)]] ([[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)|talk]]) 23:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:39, 17 August 2017

Ostreopsis

  • Reviewed: Nicola De Giosa
  • Comment: This is a two article QPQ, used also for the Palythoa toxica nomination, from which this nomination has been split. The original nomination was made on 6 August, well within the seven-day requirement for this article, which was created on 4 August.

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 13:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New and long enough, within policy, Earwig detects no copyvios, QPQ done. The hook doesn't reflect the article; the cited study implicated Ostreopsis in the adverse health effects, but not strongly enough for the way the hook is currently worded. A hook that more closely follows the wording of the article/source would be fine. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 23:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)