Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pan Am Flight 7"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>RecycledPixels
(better wording)
imported>Maile66
(Almost there, some questions)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*   -->
+
*;Review by Maile
 +
 
 +
:<u>QPQ</u>
 +
:*No QPQ needed, not enough previous nominations
 +
:<u>Eligibility</u>
 +
:*DYK Check tool verifies 321102 characters (3621 words) "readable prose size". 2049 characters prior to 5X expansion that began on August 17
 +
:<u>Sourcing</u>
 +
:*All verifiable sourcing used.
 +
:<u>Hook</u>
 +
:*Hooks sourcing verified
 +
:* Original hook is 78 characters
 +
:*ALT1 is 122 characters
 +
:<u>Images</u>
 +
:*Hook image is in the article, uploaded on Commons and licensed
 +
:<u>Copyvio check</u>
 +
:*Spot check shows no issues of concern
 +
:*Earwig's tool shows no issues of concern
 +
 
 +
[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] This is a really fascinating and detailed article.  I found some grammar awkwardness that should be clarified:
 +
 
 +
*" ... the aircraft had suffered a runway propeller as it departed San Francisco ... " Was there something wrong with the propeller?
 +
 
 +
*" ... and centrifugal force forces ... " Awkward wording.
 +
 
 +
*" ... had been flying with the company since 1942 since his graduation ... " Perhaps, " ... since his 1942 graduation ..."
 +
 
 +
*"As soon as the aircraft was reported missing and all fuel supplies had been exhausted ... " Whose fuel supplies? 
 +
 
 +
Please let me know. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 16:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 +
 
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:14, 31 August 2019

Pan Am Flight 7

A Pan Am Stratocruiser similar to the accident aircraft.
A Pan Am Stratocruiser similar to the accident aircraft.
  • ... that the cause of the crash of Pan Am Flight 7 was never able to be determined? Source: CAB report
    • ALT1:... that the week-long search for Pan Am Flight 7 was the largest search and rescue operation in the Pacific Ocean at the time? Source: San Francisco Examiner 16 Jan 1958

5x expanded by RecycledPixels (talk). Self-nominated at 19:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC).

  • Review by Maile
QPQ
  • No QPQ needed, not enough previous nominations
Eligibility
  • DYK Check tool verifies 321102 characters (3621 words) "readable prose size". 2049 characters prior to 5X expansion that began on August 17
Sourcing
  • All verifiable sourcing used.
Hook
  • Hooks sourcing verified
  • Original hook is 78 characters
  • ALT1 is 122 characters
Images
  • Hook image is in the article, uploaded on Commons and licensed
Copyvio check
  • Spot check shows no issues of concern
  • Earwig's tool shows no issues of concern

Symbol question.svg This is a really fascinating and detailed article. I found some grammar awkwardness that should be clarified:

  • " ... the aircraft had suffered a runway propeller as it departed San Francisco ... " Was there something wrong with the propeller?
  • " ... and centrifugal force forces ... " Awkward wording.
  • " ... had been flying with the company since 1942 since his graduation ... " Perhaps, " ... since his 1942 graduation ..."
  • "As soon as the aircraft was reported missing and all fuel supplies had been exhausted ... " Whose fuel supplies?

Please let me know. — Maile (talk) 16:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)