Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Panulirus penicillatus"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Response)
imported>Crisco 1492
(re)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] - Could we maybe have a more interesting hook? Something about them being 'coral cray' maybe? [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 13:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] - Could we maybe have a more interesting hook? Something about them being 'coral cray' maybe? [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 13:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 
::::There is nothing particularly interesting that leaps out of the article in my opinion. I find the hook interesting because, unlike some fish that are heavily exploited for food and whose numbers dwindle, this lobster lays so many eggs that it maintains its numbers. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 
::::There is nothing particularly interesting that leaps out of the article in my opinion. I find the hook interesting because, unlike some fish that are heavily exploited for food and whose numbers dwindle, this lobster lays so many eggs that it maintains its numbers. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 +
::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Looks absolutely fine to me. And yes, it is unusual in its field.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Chris Woodrich]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 00:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:01, 19 August 2015

Panulirus penicillatus

  • ... that although the spiny lobster Panulirus penicillatus is heavily exploited for food throughout its range, its total population seems relatively unaffected?

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC).

  • Article is brand new, long enough, neutral, uses inline citations to sources, and appears to be free of copyvio problems. The hook is OK. QPQ review checks out. No image offered for DYK; there are a couple of Commons images in the article, but I doubt they would look very good if reduced. Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg - Could we maybe have a more interesting hook? Something about them being 'coral cray' maybe? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
There is nothing particularly interesting that leaps out of the article in my opinion. I find the hook interesting because, unlike some fish that are heavily exploited for food and whose numbers dwindle, this lobster lays so many eggs that it maintains its numbers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Looks absolutely fine to me. And yes, it is unusual in its field. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)