Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Part II (On the Run)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Surtsicna
imported>Hawkeye7
(there is no consensus)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
::: I have registered an objection to the original hook so it should not be re-promoted without a clear consensus. ALT2 has a similar problem as the original hook IMO - it's a commonplace statement and thus not at all remarkable. Since there seems to be an agreement that ALT1 is acceptable, that should be the hook of choice. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 13:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)     
 
::: I have registered an objection to the original hook so it should not be re-promoted without a clear consensus. ALT2 has a similar problem as the original hook IMO - it's a commonplace statement and thus not at all remarkable. Since there seems to be an agreement that ALT1 is acceptable, that should be the hook of choice. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 13:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)     
 
:::: Yes, ALT1 is definitely better. I approved the original hook because it did not seem to me that a better one could be found, but I was obviously wrong. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 13:56, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:::: Yes, ALT1 is definitely better. I approved the original hook because it did not seem to me that a better one could be found, but I was obviously wrong. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 13:56, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 +
:::: And I've registered an objection to drive-by removals of hooks from the prep areas by editors on unacceptable grounds like "unremarkable" without even proposing an alternative. As far as I am concerned, there is no consensus, and no valid objection to the original hook, which is far more interesting. [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 14:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:07, 20 July 2013

Part II (On the Run)

Knowles performing on the I Am... Tour with Jay-Z, who she married in 2008 after several years of friendship and dating

Created/expanded by My love is love (talk). Self nominated at 17:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg The euphemism "make love" should be replaced with "have sex"; alternatively, there should be quotation marks because the phrase appears in the lyrics. The article appears to be properly sourced, along with the hook. It amazes me that so much can be written about a song that's only a few days old. Nice job. Surtsicna (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
I added quotation marks. Thank you. My love is love (talk) 00:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg I have pulled this one from prep as the hook fact is unremarkable, I would like to see a stronger hook for this nomination. Gatoclass (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Did you know
I have registered an objection to the original hook so it should not be re-promoted without a clear consensus. ALT2 has a similar problem as the original hook IMO - it's a commonplace statement and thus not at all remarkable. Since there seems to be an agreement that ALT1 is acceptable, that should be the hook of choice. Gatoclass (talk) 13:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes, ALT1 is definitely better. I approved the original hook because it did not seem to me that a better one could be found, but I was obviously wrong. Surtsicna (talk) 13:56, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
And I've registered an objection to drive-by removals of hooks from the prep areas by editors on unacceptable grounds like "unremarkable" without even proposing an alternative. As far as I am concerned, there is no consensus, and no valid objection to the original hook, which is far more interesting. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)