Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Peterborough sex abuse case"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>The Almightey Drill |
imported>Georgejdorner m (Thanks.) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:{{u|Georgejdorner}}: Whether it should or shouldn't be, ethnicity in British criminal cases has been discussed, even on cases in which there is no direct racial motive. For as many politicians or authors who say that it comes from a foreign culture problem, there are as many who say that sexual crimes committed by ethnic minorities are overscrutinised and divert attention away from a crime committed by people from all walks of life (unfortunately, anywhere in the world, children are most likely to be abused by their parents more than anybody else). These two sides of the debate are presented in a way which is balanced (last time I checked) on the articles on the Rotherham and Rochdale cases. Those two are bywords for this type of criminal activity in the UK, to the same extent as "Columbine" would refer to the shooting. Despite the heavy jail term given for the Peterborough case, it received less debate and coverage than prior ones, where accusations of police and social service misconduct were reported as hindering prosecution for years. [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 16:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | :{{u|Georgejdorner}}: Whether it should or shouldn't be, ethnicity in British criminal cases has been discussed, even on cases in which there is no direct racial motive. For as many politicians or authors who say that it comes from a foreign culture problem, there are as many who say that sexual crimes committed by ethnic minorities are overscrutinised and divert attention away from a crime committed by people from all walks of life (unfortunately, anywhere in the world, children are most likely to be abused by their parents more than anybody else). These two sides of the debate are presented in a way which is balanced (last time I checked) on the articles on the Rotherham and Rochdale cases. Those two are bywords for this type of criminal activity in the UK, to the same extent as "Columbine" would refer to the shooting. Despite the heavy jail term given for the Peterborough case, it received less debate and coverage than prior ones, where accusations of police and social service misconduct were reported as hindering prosecution for years. [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 16:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | :: Thank you for the explanation.[[User:Georgejdorner|Georgejdorner]] ([[User talk:Georgejdorner|talk]]) 15:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 16:00, 23 April 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Peterborough sex abuse case
- ... that in reaction to child sexual exploitation cases in Rochdale and in Rotherham, police investigated and prosecuted a similar case in Peterborough?
- Reviewed: Pennsylvania State Game Lands Number 55
- Comment: Not a nice topic, but one which must be spoken of fairly
Created by CurrentUK (talk). Nominated by The Almightey Drill (talk) at 12:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC).
- DYK checklist template
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Thank you for the explanation.Georgejdorner (talk) 15:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)