Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Philip and Son"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Manxruler
m (suppose this might be the best way to illustrate things)
imported>BlueMoonset
(promoted to prep 2)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Philip and Son====
 
====Philip and Son====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Philip and Son|Philip and Son}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Philip and Son|Philip and Son}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
[[File:Philip and Son boatyard at Noss near Dartmouth. - geograph.org.uk - 900661.jpg|100x100px|right|Philip and Son shipyard]]
 
[[File:Philip and Son boatyard at Noss near Dartmouth. - geograph.org.uk - 900661.jpg|100x100px|right|Philip and Son shipyard]]
 
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Philip and Son]]''' was [[Dartmouth, Devon|Dartmouth]]'s last industrial [[shipyard]] ''(pictured)''?
 
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Philip and Son]]''' was [[Dartmouth, Devon|Dartmouth]]'s last industrial [[shipyard]] ''(pictured)''?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]), [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]), [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) at 05:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]), [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]), [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) at 05:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Philip and Son|Rosiestep}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Philip and Son|Nvvchar}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Philip and Son|Dr. Blofeld}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*Added an img.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 23:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 
:*Added an img.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 23:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Line 30: Line 18:
 
::*Then we're good to go. Nice work on this interesting article. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] ([[User talk:Manxruler|talk]]) 10:08, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 
::*Then we're good to go. Nice work on this interesting article. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] ([[User talk:Manxruler|talk]]) 10:08, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 
*'''Hook''': Short enough, interesting (at least for those of us who like ships, and I think that's quite a few), cited, accurate, neutral and no blp concerns.  
 
*'''Hook''': Short enough, interesting (at least for those of us who like ships, and I think that's quite a few), cited, accurate, neutral and no blp concerns.  
*'''Other''': QPQ done (although I really would have liked a direct link to the review, rather than to the reviewed article), although I know that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_83#Old_issue_on_reviewing_-_specifics_about_what_points_are_checked nowadays we're encouraged to explain our reviews in more detail] than what is the case with the review of Levant Battery. The image is free, used in the article and looks nice and interesting to me. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] ([[User talk:Manxruler|talk]]) 01:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
+
*'''Other''': QPQ done (although I really would have liked a direct link to the review, rather than to the reviewed article), although I know that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_83#Old_issue_on_reviewing_-_specifics_about_what_points_are_checked nowadays we're encouraged to explain our reviews in more detail] than what is the case with the review of Levant Battery. The image is free, used in the article and looks nice and interesting to me. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] ([[User talk:Manxruler|talk]]) 01:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 19:32, 13 November 2012

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Philip and Son

Philip and Son shipyard

Created/expanded by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 05:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Added an img.--Nvvchar. 23:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Reviewed Levant Battery

Review: Symbol question.svg
Revised review: Symbol confirmed.svg
  • Article: Date is good (seems to me to have been created on 4 November, not 3 November, but that might be due to different time zones and such), long enough by far, neutral, cites sources (not for one claim, but I found the info in one of the cited sources. and added it to the correct place), found no copyvio in the sources available online and did agf on the books.
However, with regards to the list of ships built at the yard, the cited source does not support all the vessels listed. Specifically, HMAS Teal, HMS Everingham, Le Batofar, Lightvessel No. 11, MV Royal Iris of the Mersey and MV Snowdrop are not in the cited source. This needs to be rectified. Philip and Son might be listed as the building shipyard in the individual ship articles, but this article needs a citation for the fact that the vessels were built by Philip and Son.
  • I've removed mention of HMAS Teal, HMS Everingham, Le Batofar, Lightvessel No. 11, MV Royal Iris of the Mersey and MV Snowdrop. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Then we're good to go. Nice work on this interesting article. Manxruler (talk) 10:08, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Hook: Short enough, interesting (at least for those of us who like ships, and I think that's quite a few), cited, accurate, neutral and no blp concerns.
  • Other: QPQ done (although I really would have liked a direct link to the review, rather than to the reviewed article), although I know that nowadays we're encouraged to explain our reviews in more detail than what is the case with the review of Levant Battery. The image is free, used in the article and looks nice and interesting to me. Manxruler (talk) 01:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC)