Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Praise"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Fuebaey (new review request) |
imported>Maury Markowitz |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:::* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Oh, [[User:Skr15081997|Skr15081997]]. I almost forgot to tell you; the logs before 27 November 2014 from the sandbox [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move_repair_holding_pen&diff=638473174&oldid=638449713 were merged] into the logs of this article. Before that, the user copied-and-pasted from the sandbox on 27 November 2014. The expansion starting on 25 (or 27) November counts as fivefold. The [[WP:DYK]] rules wants typically fivefold-expanded and newly created articles. For improved articles, they must be Good Articles first. Get it? --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 17:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC) | :::* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Oh, [[User:Skr15081997|Skr15081997]]. I almost forgot to tell you; the logs before 27 November 2014 from the sandbox [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move_repair_holding_pen&diff=638473174&oldid=638449713 were merged] into the logs of this article. Before that, the user copied-and-pasted from the sandbox on 27 November 2014. The expansion starting on 25 (or 27) November counts as fivefold. The [[WP:DYK]] rules wants typically fivefold-expanded and newly created articles. For improved articles, they must be Good Articles first. Get it? --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 17:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] I'd like to request another review, since this is a first time nominator editing as part of [[Education Program:University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)/Psychology 220A (Fall, 2014)|an education program]]. I've added a QPQ, but won't object if another person agrees with George's conclusion. [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 20:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] I'd like to request another review, since this is a first time nominator editing as part of [[Education Program:University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)/Psychology 220A (Fall, 2014)|an education program]]. I've added a QPQ, but won't object if another person agrees with George's conclusion. [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 20:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] This is a superb article that I found both easy to read and very informative. It's precisely the sort of thing that we should be promoting. I can't be sure, but it appears the arguments against DYKing this are based on the delay between the major expansion and the posting of the DYK request here. If that is the case, I vote in promoting this because its ''good content'' irregardless of it following or not following ''some arbitrary rule''. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 12:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 12:38, 20 January 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Praise
- ... that praise can promote positive behavior in adjacent, non-praised individuals?
- Reviewed: A.K.A. Jessica Jones
5x expanded by Bcaplanucla (talk). Self nominated at 21:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC).
The expansion started on 26 November 2014, according to User:Bcaplanucla/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (or the history log if logs are merged). This nomination is several days over the seven-day limit. If it becomes a Good Article, you can re-nominate. --George Ho (talk) 04:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
The nominator made improvements in userspace and added the content to the main article on 2 December. This means that the readers who read the article before 2 December didn't saw the improved version. This is an excellent example of post-histherge complications. Template:Ping please review the article. Thanks.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Oh, Skr15081997. I almost forgot to tell you; the logs before 27 November 2014 from the sandbox were merged into the logs of this article. Before that, the user copied-and-pasted from the sandbox on 27 November 2014. The expansion starting on 25 (or 27) November counts as fivefold. The WP:DYK rules wants typically fivefold-expanded and newly created articles. For improved articles, they must be Good Articles first. Get it? --George Ho (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to request another review, since this is a first time nominator editing as part of an education program. I've added a QPQ, but won't object if another person agrees with George's conclusion. Fuebaey (talk) 20:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
This is a superb article that I found both easy to read and very informative. It's precisely the sort of thing that we should be promoting. I can't be sure, but it appears the arguments against DYKing this are based on the delay between the major expansion and the posting of the DYK request here. If that is the case, I vote in promoting this because its good content irregardless of it following or not following some arbitrary rule. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)