Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Reversible cellular automaton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Opabinia regalis (gtg) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 5) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Reversible cellular automaton==== | ====Reversible cellular automaton==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Reversible cellular automaton|Reversible cellular automaton}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Reversible cellular automaton|Reversible cellular automaton}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that for conventional computers, [[Landauer's principle]] gives a nonzero lower bound on energy per step, but the energy usage of '''[[Reversible cellular automaton|reversible cellular automata]]''' can be arbitrarily close to zero? | * ... that for conventional computers, [[Landauer's principle]] gives a nonzero lower bound on energy per step, but the energy usage of '''[[Reversible cellular automaton|reversible cellular automata]]''' can be arbitrarily close to zero? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Leschi (fireboat)|Leschi (fireboat)]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Leschi (fireboat)|Leschi (fireboat)]] | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Long and new enough as a new GA; no copyvio, close paraphrasing, or other content problems; hook statement cited inline. Nice work on an interesting topic (but here's hoping I remember to check how many clicks this gets :) Good to go. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Latest revision as of 05:46, 12 October 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Reversible cellular automaton
- ... that for conventional computers, Landauer's principle gives a nonzero lower bound on energy per step, but the energy usage of reversible cellular automata can be arbitrarily close to zero?
- Reviewed: Leschi (fireboat)
Improved to Good Article status by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC).
Long and new enough as a new GA; no copyvio, close paraphrasing, or other content problems; hook statement cited inline. Nice work on an interesting topic (but here's hoping I remember to check how many clicks this gets :) Good to go. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)