Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bagumba
(more work needed)
imported>Bagumba
m (format)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
{{*mp}}'''ALT2''': ... that '''[[John Young (baseball)|John Young]]''' founded '''[[Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities]]''' in 1989 as a response to declining participation among [[African American]]s in baseball?
 
{{*mp}}'''ALT2''': ... that '''[[John Young (baseball)|John Young]]''' founded '''[[Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities]]''' in 1989 as a response to declining participation among [[African American]]s in baseball?
 
{{*mp}}'''ALT3''': ... that '''[[John Young (baseball)|John Young]]''' founded '''[[Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities]]''' in 1989 as a response to declining [[African-American]] participation in baseball?
 
{{*mp}}'''ALT3''': ... that '''[[John Young (baseball)|John Young]]''' founded '''[[Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities]]''' in 1989 as a response to declining [[African-American]] participation in baseball?
**[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] It doesn't seem accurate based on the sources in the article that RBI was a response to declining participation.  First of all, the numbers from your article state a drop from 1995 to 2013, so we can't conclude that a 1986 program years earlier was a response to that decline. [http://articles.latimes.com/1990-05-22/sports/sp-208_1_baseball-program The LA Times article] only says Young pointed to a high number drafted from 4-year colleges, and a low percentage of blacks in four-year colleges.  It doesnt corroborate that there was definitively a drop in participation among blacks.  My suggestion is to either find additional sources that support the hook, or cleanup the article and come up with a different hook.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 02:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
+
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] It doesn't seem accurate based on the sources in the article that RBI was a response to declining participation.  First of all, the numbers from your article state a drop from 1995 to 2013, so we can't conclude that a 1986 program years earlier was a response to that decline. [http://articles.latimes.com/1990-05-22/sports/sp-208_1_baseball-program The LA Times article] only says Young pointed to a high number drafted from 4-year colleges, and a low percentage of blacks in four-year colleges.  It doesnt corroborate that there was definitively a drop in participation among blacks.  My suggestion is to either find additional sources that support the hook, or cleanup the article and come up with a different hook.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 02:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 02:53, 9 June 2013

Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities‎

Created by Muboshgu (talk). Self nominated at 00:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The response took place decades ago, so it would sound better written in the past tense. I would suggest providing a citation for the year the organization was founded, and then saying "... program was founded in 1989 in response ..." Also "African American" should be hyphenated (see MOS:HYPHEN) since it is an adjective. QPQ is outstanding as well.—Bagumba (talk) 02:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I like it better as a a noun. QPQ coming soon. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg It doesn't seem accurate based on the sources in the article that RBI was a response to declining participation. First of all, the numbers from your article state a drop from 1995 to 2013, so we can't conclude that a 1986 program years earlier was a response to that decline. The LA Times article only says Young pointed to a high number drafted from 4-year colleges, and a low percentage of blacks in four-year colleges. It doesnt corroborate that there was definitively a drop in participation among blacks. My suggestion is to either find additional sources that support the hook, or cleanup the article and come up with a different hook.—Bagumba (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)