Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Langdon"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jolly Janner
(okay)
imported>Gamaliel
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* <s>... that 18th century organist '''[[Richard Langdon]]''' held the positions of master of the [[choir|choristers]] and [[organist]]  full-time at [[Exeter Cathedral]], a position that had not been combined for over 150 years?</s>
 
* <s>... that 18th century organist '''[[Richard Langdon]]''' held the positions of master of the [[choir|choristers]] and [[organist]]  full-time at [[Exeter Cathedral]], a position that had not been combined for over 150 years?</s>
 
* '''ALT1''' <s>.. that 18th century organist '''[[Richard Langdon]]''' held the positions of master of the [[choir|choristers]] and [[organist]]  at [[Exeter Cathedral]], a position that had not been combined for over 100 years?</s>
 
* '''ALT1''' <s>.. that 18th century organist '''[[Richard Langdon]]''' held the positions of master of the [[choir|choristers]] and [[organist]]  at [[Exeter Cathedral]], a position that had not been combined for over 100 years?</s>
** '''ALT2'''  ... that 18th century organist '''[[Richard Langdon]]''' held the positions of master of the [[choir|choristers]] and [[organist]]  at [[Exeter Cathedral]], positions that had not been combined for over a century?
+
** '''ALT2'''  ... that 18th century organist '''[[Richard Langdon]]''' held the positions of master of the [[choir|choristers]] and [[organist]]  at [[Exeter Cathedral]], positions that had not been combined for over <s>a century</s>100 years?
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Haiti]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Haiti]]
 
:* ''Comment'': The position was briefly combined in 1661 and this is notified in the article. This is why I used the term "full-time". The source I used seemed to deem that the period in 1661 was "brief" and not worth counting.
 
:* ''Comment'': The position was briefly combined in 1661 and this is notified in the article. This is why I used the term "full-time". The source I used seemed to deem that the period in 1661 was "brief" and not worth counting.
Line 27: Line 27:
 
::: [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  Thank you {{u|Jolly Janner}}.  I tweaked your new hook a bit.  I think this is ready to go if you are okay with ALT2.  [[User:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">Gamaliel</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">talk</span>]])</small> 18:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 
::: [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  Thank you {{u|Jolly Janner}}.  I tweaked your new hook a bit.  I think this is ready to go if you are okay with ALT2.  [[User:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">Gamaliel</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">talk</span>]])</small> 18:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 
::::Fine by me. I just wanted to avoid the word century twice in one sentence. I'm sure it'll get edited in the prep/queue if needed. Thanks. '''<font color="#00824A">[[User:Jolly Janner|Jolly]]</font> <font color="#2A5FFF">[[Special:Contributions/Jolly Janner|Ω]]</font> <font color="#00824A">[[User talk:Jolly Janner|Janner]]</font>''' 04:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 
::::Fine by me. I just wanted to avoid the word century twice in one sentence. I'm sure it'll get edited in the prep/queue if needed. Thanks. '''<font color="#00824A">[[User:Jolly Janner|Jolly]]</font> <font color="#2A5FFF">[[Special:Contributions/Jolly Janner|Ω]]</font> <font color="#00824A">[[User talk:Jolly Janner|Janner]]</font>''' 04:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 +
:::::Oops, I hadn't noticed that!  Changing it back.  [[User:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">Gamaliel</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">talk</span>]])</small> 05:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 05:36, 11 March 2016

Richard Langdon

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Haiti
  • Comment: The position was briefly combined in 1661 and this is notified in the article. This is why I used the term "full-time". The source I used seemed to deem that the period in 1661 was "brief" and not worth counting.

Created by AtticTapestry (talk). Nominated by Jolly Janner (talk) at 04:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Template:Ping "Full-time" is an assumption that I'm not sure is justified by the sources. 1661 to 1762 is a full century though, so why not just use that number instead? Gamaliel (talk) 23:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Gamaliel. That is a valid criticism and I have slightly tweaked the original hook and proposed it as an alternative. Jolly Ω Janner 04:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
16px Thank you Template:U. I tweaked your new hook a bit. I think this is ready to go if you are okay with ALT2. Gamaliel (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Fine by me. I just wanted to avoid the word century twice in one sentence. I'm sure it'll get edited in the prep/queue if needed. Thanks. Jolly Ω Janner 04:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Oops, I hadn't noticed that! Changing it back. Gamaliel (talk) 05:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)