Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Scull"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Edwardx
 
imported>DYKReviewBot
m (Automatically reviewing nomination: There may be issues which need to be addressed (Problems? Report it.))
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
 +
<!-- Automated review by User:DYKReviewBot -->
 +
<includeonly><div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;"><div class="NavHead" style="background:transparent;text-align:left;"></includeonly>{{*}}[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] '''Some issues found.'''<includeonly></div><div class="NavContent" style="background:transparent;text-align:left;"></includeonly>
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> This article is new and was created on 18:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> This article meets the DYK criteria at 2177 characters
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 +
**<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">&#x2717;</span> This article has the following issues:
 +
***{{tlx|US-business-bio-1910s-stub}} from creation
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (14.5% confidence; [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Robert+Scull&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1 confirm])
 +
***Note to reviewers: There is '''low confidence''' in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do ''not'' constitute a copyright violation.<includeonly></div></div></includeonly>
 +
<includeonly><div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;"><div class="NavHead" style="background:transparent;text-align:left;"></includeonly>{{*}}'''[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Some overall issues detected'''<includeonly></div><div class="NavContent" style="background:transparent;text-align:left;"></includeonly>
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 139 characters
 +
**<span style="color:green;" alt="Green tick" title="Green tick">&#x2713;</span> The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 1 characters
 +
**<span style="color:red;" alt="Red X" title="Red X">&#x2717;</span> [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
 +
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.<includeonly></div></div></includeonly> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 20:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 +
<!-- End automated review -->
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:47, 30 October 2016

Robert Scull

  • ... that Robert Scull auction in 1973 of 50 Pop art works from his collection was viewed by the art establishment as the nouveaux riche cashing in? Source: "That auction, “The Collection of Robert C. Scull,” was the first of contemporary American art by a single seller. Its 50 lots of mostly Pop Art brought in $2.2 million (about $10.8 million in 2010 dollars), just above the high estimate, along with stunning evidence that the value of 1960s art would rise exponentially. It was immediately seen as a fall from grace for the Sculls — nouveaux riches cashing in — and the New York art world too." (and [1], or briefly cite, the source)
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link], or briefly cite, the source)
  • Reviewed: not yet done

Created by Edwardx (talk) and Modernist (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 22:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC).


  1. REDIRECT Template:•Symbol question.svg Some issues found.
    • This article is new and was created on 18:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2177 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has the following issues:
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (14.5% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  1. REDIRECT Template:•Symbol question.svg Some overall issues detected
    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 139 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 1 characters
    • Edwardx has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)